Ncaa done shuts down investigation

#101
#101
WoodsmanVol said:
If you know my posts, you know I'm constantly jackassing, snarking, and making fun of everything, and everybody, including myself. Of all our crazy Vols fans, I'm in a league of my own, cause many of the others do have a level of sanity, I never had any.
Click to expand...
I here for all of that! You’re good in my book! I also do the same. I took no offense by your post :)
 
#103
#103
Rockytop10nessee said:
I disagree. If a player has no malicious intent out still puts another player in danger due to a stupid play, accidental or not, that player deserves to be ejected. Form tackle safely or sit out.
Click to expand...
Sometimes they uphold on the technicalities, sometimes players hit coming down or hit in a stumble by sheer accident. Tebow and several players even say when the collision was by mere accident and light there should be no player thrown out. Sometimes collisions happen where neither player has control nor intent. Some calls have already be appealed and players next game suspension has been lifted. They should be able to look and determine no loss of time on certain inadvertent hits. GBO
 
#104
#104
Woodlawn VOL said:
Sometimes they uphold on the technicalities, sometimes players hit coming down or hit in a stumble by sheer accident. Tebow and several players even say when the collision was by mere accident and light there should be no player thrown out. Sometimes collisions happen where neither player has control nor intent. Some calls have already be appealed and players next game suspension has been lifted. They should be able to look and determine no loss of time on certain inadvertent hits. GBO
Click to expand...
This has been suggested before but.....they need to institute a flagrant 1 and 2 style system like the NBA. Player safety needs to be paramount but the ejection on the type of play you mention is excessive. So call that targeting 1 with a penalty, but no ejection in that situation. If the foul is excessive or intentional call targeting 2 that follows current ejection rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JacketVol and Woodlawn VOL
#105
#105
cgrish said:
It had everything to do with nil rules, NCCA has no jurisdiction over it at the present time.
Click to expand...
Our case was over preferential benefits during recruitment. NCAA was after UT for private plane rides for potential recruits and influencing a recruit because of NIL. It was not about the money that NICO received.
 
#106
#106
Sec and Big 10 about to form its own governing body. NCAA is dead man walking.
 
#107
#107
NEO said:
Sec and Big 10 about to form its own governing body. NCAA is dead man walking.
Click to expand...
There are something like 1,118 colleges and universities who participate in NCAA tournaments and follow NCAA-maintained rule books.

That institution isn't dying even if the entirety of Division I-A (FBS, in football terms) cuts bait. It will continue on in a less lucrative way, still the #1 most significant college sports entity in the nation.

Don't get me wrong. I have zero love for the NCAA. But I don't have to like it to understand its vast reach and hold.

Go Vols!
 
#108
#108
VFL-82-JP said:
There are something like 1,118 colleges and universities who participate in NCAA tournaments and follow NCAA-maintained rule books.

That institution isn't dying even if the entirety of Division I-A (FBS, in football terms) cuts bait. It will continue on in a less lucrative way, still the #1 most significant college sports entity in the nation.

Don't get me wrong. I have zero love for the NCAA. But I don't have to like it to understand its vast reach and hold.

Go Vols!
Click to expand...


College basketball and football are their own entity and not really amateur sports anymore. When I talk about the NCAA I am only talking these two sports. But I could still see a scenario where these two conferences completely bail out if the NCAA and the rest remain under it.
 
#109
#109
DowsaTV said:
Never in doubt. Now throw out the NCAA and the targeting rule with them.

:)
Click to expand...
Yes and No, The targeting rule needs to be more defined and consistent across the board. I think they should have a Intentional/non-intentional targeting. Intentional gets you kicked out of game + 15 yards. Non intentional is just a 15 yard penalty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JCHateSteve
#110
#110
allvols4life said:
Ahr

Agree, it may just be lingering "BVS" but,I cannot help but think that... if the NCAA were to win the actual verdict in court that we would have a bullseye on our back forever.
Click to expand...
Freedom is never cheap. You are correct, but sometimes it is worth the fight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvols4life
#111
#111
tennesseeduke said:
Our case was over preferential benefits during recruitment. NCAA was after UT for private plane rides for potential recruits and influencing a recruit because of NIL. It was not about the money that NICO received.
Click to expand...
The injunction protects NIL money, NIL contacts and contracts, and individual boosters endorsements. It also prohibits retroactive enforcement against the athletes or the schools, even if the NCAA wins the case. That is VERY unlikely.

The fact that two state AGs are arguing the case speaks volumes for the likely outcome.
 
#113
#113
S.C. OrangeMan said:
The injunction protects NIL money, NIL contacts and contracts, and individual boosters endorsements. It also prohibits retroactive enforcement against the athletes or the schools, even if the NCAA wins the case. That is VERY unlikely.

The fact that two state AGs are arguing the case speaks volumes for the likely outcome.
Click to expand...
That was the outcome, not the reason we went to court.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top