I don't think we'd have an answer for him--and he's tormenting kentucky, a team with a lot of size. The Shocker PG is good--great court awareness. Isn't he 26 years old or somesuch. Anybody see our game with the shockers? I know we lost by 9.
In the case of keeping a bad coach based on a run of beating bad teams at the expense of setting your program back, I do not.
I'm of the belief beating four sub .500 teams and Missouri, Iowa, Mass and Mercer might still be worthy of being fired. I was hoping he'd have to actually beat good teams to make it to the Sweet 16. Not Missouri, Iowa who lost 6 of their last 7, Mass who was incorrectly seeded and Mercer upsetting Duke for us.
In general, I don't care what route it takes to win it all. But when a coach consistently beats nobody good and gets to the Sweet 16 in the easiest route possible for another season, possibly extension... wtf. All he proved was he can beat bad teams/programs. I want to actually beat good teams to see if he belongs.
I'm in the minority on this though so it's whatevs. Also, f Kentucky.
Said the same thing to my wife 15 min ago when UK made their run to take the lead. Cal's teams almost always grow up at the end of the season. The schedule they play doesn't always bode well for W's and L's but it bodes well for when it counts.