NCAA to release sanctions on South Carolina

#27
#27
More fodder for the non-SEC fans claiming the NCAA is an arm of the SEC.
 
Last edited:
#29
#29
After they didn't do shat to USCsr, everyone else can stfu.

...are you talking about the 2 year bowl ban, four years probation, forfeiture of a year's wins/championship, and loss of scholarships over 3 years? (what was it, 10 a year?)
 
#30
#30
...are you talking about the 2 year bowl ban, four years probation, forfeiture of a year's wins/championship, and loss of scholarships over 3 years? (what was it, 10 a year?)

Yes. Compared with what they did, their punishment was weak sauce. The idea of vacating the wins was weak, too. Vacating wins does nothing of merit.
 
#31
#31
Yes. Their punishment was weak sauce. The idea of vacating the wins was weak, too. Vacating wins does nothing of merit.

Ok, so now I just want to know why that's weak, especially when it was one of the harsher penalties they had doled out to a major program since around the SMU case or so

Or are you just one of those pro-death penalty guys in this case?
 
#32
#32
Ok, so now I just want to know why that's weak, especially when it was one of the harsher penalties they had doled out to a major program since around the SMU case or so

Or are you just one of those pro-death penalty guys in this case?

The death penalty would be too harsh.

The 'sanctions' did nothing to hurt USC. They still piled up recruits because of back counting, and now they are poised to make a run for a national title fresh off of a two-year bowl ban.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#34
#34
I don't care if you're USC or USCjr or USCe, or whatever you are, I don't like any of yuns! I don't care for Southern California in particular either.
 
#36
#36
The death penalty would be too harsh.

The 'sanctions' did nothing to hurt USC. They still piled up recruits because of back counting, and now they are poised to make a run for a national title fresh off of a two-year bowl ban.

They did prepare smartly by back counting heavily
 
#38
#38
The death penalty would be too harsh.

The 'sanctions' did nothing to hurt USC. They still piled up recruits because of back counting, and now they are poised to make a run for a national title fresh off of a two-year bowl ban.

THIS,they got off way too easy.. vacating wins? Who cares? They still played them. Everyone knows who won or lost... They shouldn't of been able to back count anything... Should of been no bowl games for 5 years and a 15 scholly a year recruiting class for 4 years. That would get the point across about cheating and illegal benefits.
 
#39
#39
The death penalty would be too harsh.

The 'sanctions' did nothing to hurt USC. They still piled up recruits because of back counting, and now they are poised to make a run for a national title fresh off of a two-year bowl ban.

USC jr going an a run for the NC, you're as delusional as the Arkansas fans, that thought they could land Gruden
 
#45
#45
oops, read it again and guess you mean the real USC in your post..

2ccuhj9.jpg
 

VN Store



Back
Top