NCAA Tournament: Thursday

#251
#251
Xavier keeps leaving the door slightly cracked for Ole Miss but they're too dumbly-coached to take advantage.
 
#252
#252
LittleCat said:
CAfYYRQUkAAiiYp.jpg
Click to expand...

controversial-non-call-at-the-end-of-smu-ucla-b.gif
 
#260
#260
The dumbest thing about the call was that there was one replay from on the floor that showed how clear the missed call was, yet they showed it one time and then never showed it again.
 
#263
#263
The overhead video is a bad angle to try to determine goaltending. The ball is moving across the very edge of the rim and when the player touches it, the overhead shot does not give any idea how far above the plane of the rim the bottom of the ball is. It could be about to touch the rim or it could be clearly flying over the rim without ever touching it. The angle from the shooter is the one where the judgement should be made. I would say from that angle it has a chance to graze the rim. And I guess based on the rules that means goaltending. Although realtime live I thought it was an airball.
 
#266
#266
Freak said:
Just saw it there after I posted. That's crazy.

I'm mobile but it's hard to tell whether he actually touched it.
Click to expand...

Yeah he definitely touched it but by rule the ball has to have a chance to go in. That one didn't.
 
#267
#267
Good grief Ole Miss has the lowest total IQ of any team I've watched today, and I watched all of that UCLA-SMU game.
 
#268
#268
The real question is why aren't goal tending calls reviewable? At least in the last 2 minutes.
 
#269
#269
ZZ13 said:
The overhead video is a bad angle to try to determine goaltending. The ball is moving across the very edge of the rim and when the player touches it, the overhead shot does not give any idea how far above the plane of the rim the bottom of the ball is. It could be about to touch the rim or it could be clearly flying over the rim without ever touching it. The angle from the shooter is the one where the judgement should be made. I would say from that angle it has a chance to graze the rim. And I guess based on the rules that means goaltending. Although realtime live I thought it was an airball.
Click to expand...

I think it did graze the rim. Even from the overhead view you can see the ball change course two separate times. Once when it grazed the rim, and a second time when it was swatted away.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top