While I would tend to agree, Watford and Oladipo combined for 42 of their points and they shot 58% in the first half. UK had the game at 13 twice and didn't keep the foot down all the way. In summation:
- Kentucky's best player basically didn't play the first half.
- Their best offensive player (watford) had a season high
- IU shot 52% for the game and scored 90, and still lost by 12.
Teams are running out of ways to actually "beat" Kentucky, they have to hope for some luck. I'll be the first to say it can happen in the blink of an eye, but this tourney is Kentucky's to lose. I hate saying it, but it just feels that way.
I can't believe how arrogant people can be after beating IU by 12 in what was supposed to be the big revenge blowout.
Glad I'm in FL.
The only fan base as bad to be around during a playoff run is the Yankees.
Beat a good team without getting double digits more free throws than them. I dare you.
Beat a good team without getting double digits more free throws than them. I dare you.
I'm sure it's coincidence that we have athletes (Heading to the league) who get to the rim at will and draw contract, while Indiana shoots jumpers. Or that UK shot 16 FT's in the last few minutes during the onslaught of fouls that prolonged the inevitable. Or that several fouls were on offensive rebounds where they worked harder to get the ball.
The first half had pretty iffy officiating. After that I was fine with most calls/non-calls. People need to remove their bias, I suppose.
Also, predictions for today: Louisville over UF, tosu over Syracuse.
I completely understnad Ky getting to the stripe a few more times than their opponents. But not 20, which happens on a regular basis.