So your argument is because we had the worst AD in the history of UT that we should have kept Fulmer because the alt wasn't better? Do you enjoy mediocrity? Because the last five years that's what Fulmer brought here with the exception of 1 year. Sure 8 wins sounds great right now, but 8 wins or less had become ok with Fulmer late in his coaching career here. 8 wins is average to me. You want someone who can give you a shot at being 13-0 at the end of the year, and late in Fulmer's legacy here he wasn't that man. Fulmer was ok with 8-4 seasons or less. UT should never be ok with 8-4 seasons. I'm not saying that if you have a coach that goes 12-0, 10-2, then 8-4 we should fire him after the 8-4 season, but Fulmer didn't just have 8-4 type seasons, he had 5-7 and 7-5 seasons and never could win the big games late in his career. If we had kept Fulmer we were doomed to be average and nothing more. The man lost his edge, it's that simple. He lost his edge in recruiting and coaching, and had Chevis not been here to save his butt over and over the results would have been much worse late in his tenure here.