GUNTERSVOL
VOL FROM BIRTH
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2017
- Messages
- 6,555
- Likes
- 8,705
Came to say this. He is extremely talented and you would be blind to not see that. He is however, a freshman who played like a freshman. He was either on his back, or running for his life. Did you see the grass stains covering that poor guy’s jersey?! Back to the point, he will be a good one for Clemson in the future.
Maybe, maybe not. Will he consistently be clutch? Who knows? Has he already peaked? Who knows. We have had a few young guys show up here and get showered with lofty expectations that never materialized. When he earns it, give it to him, until then networks should concentrate on splitting their coverage more evenly. They did feature Joe losing his starter slot at MICH, then losing his starter slot at UT. They did give him some consolation props for being HH's best bud, but could not even keep his dog's breed straight.
How many times did they mention Joe's overthrows? They sounded like some of our own agenda driven posters. Their agenda was to praise a freshman. Amazing how our PI calls were all golden, even if no contact till after the ball hit us in the back, or even when we turned and made a play on the ball, but their contact was not good but great defense. It reached barf bag level. How many of his yards came after drives were extended by penalties... some definitely correct, others marginal at best, and wrong based on the bar they set on our guys. But drives extended regardless by actions other than his own. What was he 0 fer 4 on 4th downs. That counts too. Did they mention he had 2 more ints tonight than Joe did all season? Did they feature his 55% completion rate vs Joe's 67%? He did not deserve praise or trashing, he deserved to be fairly observed. So did Joe. Did not happen; till post game. Bad time ratio.