RollinVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 4,802
- Likes
- 4,898
Fulmer to Buffalo? (someone had to be the first to say it)
Objective question - why a solid choice? Record at Buffalo does not appear very good. 20-30 overall, more importantly 14-18 against his level of competition within the conference. I don't follow him or his program; is there something extraordinary in his abilities that isn't evident from on field record?I figured he would get the nod. Solid choice for them.
Objective question - why a solid choice? Record at Buffalo does not appear very good. 20-30 overall, more importantly 14-18 against his level of competition within the conference. I don't follow him or his program; is there something extraordinary in his abilities that isn't evident from on field record?
Objective question - why a solid choice? Record at Buffalo does not appear very good. 20-30 overall, more importantly 14-18 against his level of competition within the conference. I don't follow him or his program; is there something extraordinary in his abilities that isn't evident from on field record?
Guys its freaking Buffalo is pretty hilarious.
How about it is freaking Kansas.
Charles Barkley is an idiot, and Turner Gil would have flamed out at Auburn.
When he fails at Kansas it will be blamed on the program and not the man. It may actually be a valid thing to say as well, but Turner Gil is not freaking Tony Dungy, he is a guy who had Dave Clawsen like results and has been hyped by a few prominent friends.
Guys its freaking Buffalo is pretty hilarious.
How about it is freaking Kansas.
Charles Barkley is an idiot, and Turner Gil would have flamed out at Auburn.
When he fails at Kansas it will be blamed on the program and not the man. It may actually be a valid thing to say as well, but Turner Gil is not freaking Tony Dungy, he is a guy who had Dave Clawsen like results and has been hyped by a few prominent friends.
Again, where's the objective evidence? A college student telling me "its a good hire because I say so" doesn't do anything for me. The numbers on paper don't add up for me, so is there any independent expert analysis, or quotes from reputable peers, or something meaningful?Anybody wanna set up a "loser leaves the site forever" bet with MHF here regarding Gill's success in Lawrence?
Good hire by KU.