She won't resign and give up that money. And if we fire her this year, she will sue for even more money. UT will give her a year to turn things around and meet goals and expectations. Hart's not going to walk into a sure lawsuit.
Everyone that has been calling for Dunbar, well you saw in the first half that she had one three, gave two straight baskets, and then allowed a guard to push her out of bounds to get a rebound.
Will they really be able to convince these players to come back and give it another year if they already made up their minds that they want to transfer?
I'm not one who wants the players to transfer so Hart's hand is forced and he fires Holly, but Cooper, Nared, Russell and DeShields would be fools to stay on this team past this season. They are risking their futures for a coach that hasn't proven that she can help them.
No, there's not. Coaches are graded by the performance of their team. If UT were to fire her, they can show cause. The fact that there's an ongoing Title IX investigation does not play into this. You're allowing paranoia to cloud your judgement.
I'm not one who wants the players to transfer so Hart's hand is forced and he fires Holly, but Cooper, Nared, Russell and DeShields would be fools to stay on this team past this season. They are risking their futures for a coach that hasn't proven that she can help them.
Poor performance buys a year to fix the problems and meet clearly defined goals and expectations. Remember Dooley after 2011?
This doesn't fall under Title IX. This is similar to the three civil suits UT just settled for more than $1M. Title IX is only relevant because that suit has put UT in a negative public light, and Dave Hart has developed a reputation of being unfriendly to women.
It's not paranoia. It's logic and common sense.
Debbie Jennings filed a lawsuit alleging unlawful termination due to retaliation and discrimination. If Holly were to file a lawsuit and win she would be entitled to the remaining value of her contract plus punitive damages. Punitive damages are capped in Tennessee so the amount from those damages she could get as opposed to a straight buyout as usually happens when coaches are fired is very minimal. In the grand scheme of things there would be very little to gain financially that she wouldn't already get.
That's not even addressing the validity of her claim which isn't even a slam dunk.
It's true.... What grounds could she possibly sue on.... That's why contracts are drawn up the way they are.
No way Holly gets fired when UT is in the midst of a Title IX lawsuit. She would sue UT, add fuel to the negative publicity, cause even more problems for UT... and receive a big settlement. The LVs may lose players, fans and prestige after this horrific season, but Holly will be back for another year.
Has UT ever fired a male HC after one bad season following only successful ones?
Poor performance buys a year to fix the problems and meet clearly defined goals and expectations. Remember Dooley after 2011?
This doesn't fall under Title IX. This is similar to the three civil suits UT just settled for more than $1M. Title IX is only relevant because that suit has put UT in a negative public light, and Dave Hart has developed a reputation of being unfriendly to women.
It's not paranoia. It's logic and common sense.