New Rivals Ratings To Be Released Monday & Tuesday

#27
#27
I'm guessing they'll release the 100 today, the 250 on Tuesday, and then updated position rankings later in the week
 
#29
#29
glhal2814 said:
He also has pointed out repeatedly they are lowering the number of 4 and 5 stars handed out to match up with the stated goals - 5 stars reflecting the guys who should become 1st round picks and 4 stars should become All-Conference players.
Click to expand...

So, let me get this straight. We fret and stress over these rating services based on their alleged abilities and knowledge to rate a bunch of teenagers as to their potential of being a NFL first round pick or All-SEC player before they have even graduated from high school, much less having finished a single practice in college? And it's fairly safe to say they rate these players without having seen many or most of them play a game in person.

The NFL could use their help. They spent hundreds and possibly thousands of man hours to rate Ryan Leaf and Jamarcus Russell and missed terribly on both. Am I the only one who thinks the NFL can rate or rank players far better than Rivals or Scout? The remarkable thing is the NFL still misses on many players, even after seeing them compete for 3 or 4 years. But not Rivals...they know when the kids is barely through their junior year in high school they are going to be a superstar.

Tell me I'm not the only one who thinks these player ratings or rankings is a joke...
 
#31
#31
Absolutely nothing favoring the Vols, AR dropped several spots too.
 
#34
#34
"Danville (Ky.) Boyle County linebacker Lamar Dawson (uncommitted) just missed the Rivals100 last time around, checking in at No. 101. This time around however the state's best player moved up to No. 54 thanks to a dominant senior season. Peterson recently checked him out in person."
 
#35
#35
In the chat they said that one current commit would move in to the 250, but you would have to wait until tomorrow. Worley?
 
#38
#38
WinginFlorida said:
So, let me get this straight. We fret and stress over these rating services based on their alleged abilities and knowledge to rate a bunch of teenagers as to their potential of being a NFL first round pick or All-SEC player before they have even graduated from high school, much less having finished a single practice in college? And it's fairly safe to say they rate these players without having seen many or most of them play a game in person.

The NFL could use their help. They spent hundreds and possibly thousands of man hours to rate Ryan Leaf and Jamarcus Russell and missed terribly on both. Am I the only one who thinks the NFL can rate or rank players far better than Rivals or Scout? The remarkable thing is the NFL still misses on many players, even after seeing them compete for 3 or 4 years. But not Rivals...they know when the kids is barely through their junior year in high school they are going to be a superstar.

Tell me I'm not the only one who thinks these player ratings or rankings is a joke...
Click to expand...

I don't think it's an error of scouting staffs. I think it's the arrogance of coaches and blissful ignorance of some GMs/Owners.

They (coaches) think they can take a guy with an enormous arm but little work ethic and turn him into an NFL MVP.
 
#39
#39
DC Vol said:
I don't think it's an error of scouting staffs. I think it's the arrogance of coaches and blissful ignorance of some GMs/Owners.

They (coaches) think they can take a guy with an enormous arm but little work ethic and turn him into an NFL MVP.
Click to expand...

and the fact that all it takes is one. I'm sure quite a few laughed at the draft choices
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top