maxxx
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
- Messages
- 516
- Likes
- 422
who the hell cares about where someone "ranks" a kid who has never set foot on a college campus??:no: What matters is whether the kid is football smart, coachable, and willing to work hard. Those are the things that winning programs are built on, not whether a kid is 4 or 5 stars. Since coming to this site I have grown sick of all the talk of stars when recruiting. Its OVERRATED period. As i have said before, players in certain parts of the country tend to be rated higher solely based on where they are from, not there ability. as has been stated before on this site by me and others, a 3 star prospect is still a player that has pro potential. Take Fulton this year. He was a 3 star and looks like a budding star on the O-line here. I have worked with 2 kids that were 3 stars and are in the NFL. The point is stop putting so much faith and hope in what the phony experts say about a kids ranking. If Dooley can bring in 3 stars that will stay out of trouble and bust their asses UT will be back at the top soon. Too many programs around the country take that approach and are successful each year. Damn the stars and judge the kid and his fit to the program.