New York City

And yet I was the one that knew what "allude" means, and what question marks are used for. Hmmm...
You still don’t. I wasn’t “alluding” anything you claimed and you made things up based on a parenthetical that I included explicitly. A question mark doesn’t mean you get to say whatever stupid **** you want without pushback
I asked for clarity and you pooped down your leg. But by all means, carry on. I can send you some Tucks pads if it means we can be friends again.
It’s self explanatory, what clarity do you need? You tried to make a big deal about often and I said yes, that’s a fact, it often is. And you’re still confused just like you’ve been this whole time lol
 
You still don’t. I wasn’t “alluding” anything you claimed and you made things up based on a parenthetical that I included explicitly. A question mark doesn’t mean you get to say whatever stupid **** you want without pushback

It’s self explanatory, what clarity do you need? You tried to make a big deal about often and I said yes, that’s a fact, it often is. And you’re still confused just like you’ve been this whole time lol
Do you remember that time that I said that liberals inject race into everything, often times without even realizing it?

Yah. That was cool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Do you remember that time that I said that liberals inject race into everything, often times without even realizing it?

Yah. That was cool.
I remember that time you wasted our time starting this conversation because you couldn’t comprehend what you read
 
If drugs didn’t kill him back it up. See how easy that is? It’s odd that these worthless, drug addict criminals are putting themselves in these positions but it’s never the drugs only whitey.
Reverse UNO card played!

The living can defend themselves. Fully unsurprising that your “just an opinion” has been immediately adopted by C-south as fact, despite clearly knowing nothing about the case. This is why I don’t like when people spread misinformation like this

The dead can defend themselves too. Video evidence, toxicology report and eye-witnesses all say he f’around and found out. That’s not misinformation. Sorry the good guy got off for saving others.
 
Reverse UNO card played!



The dead can defend themselves too. Video evidence, toxicology report and eye-witnesses all say he was f’around and found out. That’s not misinformation. Sorry the good guy got off for saving others.
None of those things say drugs killed him. I swear Sunday morning has brought out the righties who are 2/10 intelligent yet 10/10 argumentative
 
None of those things say drugs killed him. I swear Sunday morning has brought out the righties who are 2/10 intelligent yet 10/10 argumentative
Another post, and you can’t prove drugs didn’t kill him. It was a city of lefties that found him not guilty. It was a city of lefties that were threatened. Does that make you 1/10 intelligent as you’re getting railed here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Another post, and you can’t prove drugs didn’t kill him. It was a city of lefties that found him not guilty. It was a city of lefties that were threatened. Does that make you 1/10 intelligent as you’re getting railed here.
Asking me to prove a negative that is supported by zero evidence and that his own attorneys didn't even attempt to argue, 2/10 may have been too high
 
Asking me to prove a negative that is supported by zero evidence and that his own attorneys didn't even attempt to argue, 2/10 may have been too high
So wordsmithing stance again. He had drugs in system my guy/gal, medical examiner established that. I’m sure no pun by you in saying “too high” in defending Neely. Again, sorry the leftist city saw justice served.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
So wordsmithing stance again. He had drugs in system my guy/gal, medical examiner established that. I’m sure no pun by you in saying “too high” in defending Neely. Again, sorry the leftist city saw justice served.
None of those things say drugs killed him. I swear Sunday morning has brought out the righties who are 2/10 intelligent yet 10/10 argumentative
And I suspect that you are slowly realizing there isn't anything that does. To be clear, saying that opinion is full of **** is not "wordsmithing." Good talk lol
 
Exposing yourself as someone who can't read and then subsequently coping by throwing Hail Marys about period usage should be embarrassing for you, but is admittedly hilarious
Yah. That's it.

Or. Playing the tired "can't read" defense instead of clarifying when asked, and then, having played the "you don't read so good" card while repeatedly failing proper punctuation is a much better look.

You sure is awsum at this here d-bate thingy ma thangajiggy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Yah. That's it.

Or. Playing the tired "can't read" defense instead of clarifying when asked, and then, having played the "you don't read so good" card while repeatedly failing proper punctuation is a much better look.

You sure is awsum at this here d-bate thingy ma thangajiggy.
No one gives a **** about punctuation on a message board but when you start making things up from people's posts and then spamming things like #OnlyDeadBlackLives(Really)Matter repeatedly, you shouldn't be surprised when you get called out for making things up
 
And I suspect that you are slowly realizing there isn't anything that does. To be clear, saying that opinion is full of **** is not "wordsmithing." Good talk lol
None of those things say drugs killed him. I swear Sunday morning has brought out the righties who are 2/10 intelligent yet 10/10 argumentative
His actions on drugs are what killed him. It’s really not that hard to understand. I’ll wait patiently for your next attempt of insults, typical reaction from those who feel defeated and need to speak.
 
His actions on drugs are what killed him. It’s really not that hard to understand. I’ll wait patiently for your next attempt of insults, typical reaction from those who feel defeated and need to speak.
Brother if you want to make a "boo-yah, he's acquitted" post then make one yourself. You quoted me in a conversation about cause of death, only to make zero arguments on that topic and apparently agree with me that his cause of death wasn't K2. Arguing just to argue with no thought behind it, just like I said
 
No one gives a **** about punctuation on a message board but when you start making things up from people's posts and then spamming things like #OnlyDeadBlackLives(Really)Matter repeatedly, you shouldn't be surprised when you get called out for making things up
Speaking of reading comprehension... Again... A question mark is not a statement, but a question.

In short, I asked why you had to insert race, asked if you meant "x", and stated, basically, that it can be seen as racist (i.e. inserting race for no apparent reason).

Instead of clarifying when asked, you drove the conversation in this direction.

You can either (a) describe what the reason for the distinction was, (b) admit that it was a distinction without meaning, (c) continue to attack and divert in an effort to escape points a and b, or (d) just go have a snickers.

But let's be honest here. We both know that I read just fine, and you are squirming.

Again... Either you inserted race for what you considered a good reason, or you inserted race as a distinction without meaning. Either seems worthy of discussion on a political board, having been in this climate where liberals are the ones accusing conservatives of being racist, while the liberals are generally the ones drumming everything up to be about race.


Now, please read the above slowly and carefully, and maybe we can get to an actual, honest conversation about the topic.

Or, you can just play the same old, tired, lazy "U dont read so good do u" posts.

The choice is yours. To your delight, I'll add that, short of an actual, good faith and intelligent response on the topic, I won't waste another post on it.

Hope you have a great day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Brother if you want to make a "boo-yah, he's acquitted" post then make one yourself. You quoted me in a conversation about cause of death, only to make zero arguments on that topic and apparently agree with me that his cause of death wasn't K2. Arguing just to argue with no thought behind it, just like I said
No, cause of death was he f’around and found out. Was he on K2 at the time of death? It’s a yes or no. It’s that simple.

I don’t “boo-yah”. I don’t look to Jim Cramer for financial guidance.
 
In short, I asked why you had to insert race, asked if you meant "x", and stated, basically, that it can be seen as racist (i.e. inserting race for no apparent reason).
Post is right there. Why attempt to rewrite it?
Just out of curiosity, you're alluding that slandering dead black people is worse than slandering other dead people? That smells a little racist.
 
No, cause of death was he f’around and found out. Was he on K2 at the time of death? It’s a yes or no. It’s that simple.
If you agree with me that his cause of death wasn't K2, then it was really stupid and a waste of time to quote me as if you didn't. You're agreeing with me and looking for other things to argue about
 
Post is right there. Why attempt to rewrite it?
1734276275258.png

Here you go. I literally asked a question and told you how it can come across. Instead of clarifying, you attacked. Here we are.

Why the distinction? Why is it important to inject race? Either you thought it important to inject race, and you can tell us why. Or you just injected race for no good reason, and can tell us why.
 

VN Store



Back
Top