New Zealand Terror Attack

#2
#2
  • Like
Reactions: vols40 and AM64
#6
#6
#9
#9
Yet the killing happened anyway. Killers are going to kill one way or another. Guns aren’t the problem.

As far as I can tell from the story, none of the victims were killed. Again, he didn't have a gun and couldn't inflict massive damage before being neutralized.
 
#12
#12
Lemme know when you see me advocating for law enforcement to not have guns. Big difference between government having guns and the weekend rambos/terrorists having guns.
You're not anti gun. You're anti private citizen's gun. You're pro state gun. Fortunately, never in recorded history has that arrangement been used to oppress people.
 
#13
#13
As far as I can tell from the story, none of the victims were killed. Again, he didn't have a gun and couldn't inflict massive damage before being neutralized.
All we need to determine is what the acceptable number of casualties is so that we can limit implements to the citizens so as to not exceed those casualty levels. Then when they find a way to exceed those casualty levels we’ll take more implements away. After all this is a tool problem not an individual accountability problem. 🤡
 
#20
#20
For everyone of these, there are 20+ gun murders.

The standard deflection. (I understand, it's all you've got)

The police were not there. In fact they are damn near NEVER there* when things actually go down, be it in public or at home. Who WAS there was an armed individual who was able to meet force with force and likely saved live in doing so.

*That's not the LEOs fault. Only an absolute idiot would have the expectation that a cop would be right there on scene when needed.
 

VN Store



Back
Top