cotton
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2005
- Messages
- 11,216
- Likes
- 9
The thread about NFL talent on our roster, combined wtih some assertions (at least before the Arkansas game,) that we will be national contenders next year, got me thinking about how next year's team will look. The list is compiled of underclassmen that I can recall getting significant time this year, and doesn't include any newcomers. Also, I believe that Meacham will be a huge difference-maker next year. For the San Francisco 49ers.
QB Ainge
Wr Rogers
Wr Taylor
Wr Hancock?
TE Cottam
TB Coker or Foster
C McNeil
G Foster
G Parker
T Young
T ??
T Bolden
T Mapu
E Fisher
E Reynolds
LB Karl
LB Mayo
LB Myers-White?
DB Fellows
DB Heffney
DB Morley
DB Gaines? Wardlow?
At first glance, it appears that we downgrade at WR, stay the same at QB and RB and, without some significant improvement in the offseason to make up for the loss of Sears, will do no better than stay the same on the O-line.
The defense should be better as those younger guys improve but will have some questions in the secondary. We really need one of those D-linemen to get exposed to gamma rays and become a monster by September.
So, does that roster look like a conference or national contender? Have I missed something?
QB Ainge
Wr Rogers
Wr Taylor
Wr Hancock?
TE Cottam
TB Coker or Foster
C McNeil
G Foster
G Parker
T Young
T ??
T Bolden
T Mapu
E Fisher
E Reynolds
LB Karl
LB Mayo
LB Myers-White?
DB Fellows
DB Heffney
DB Morley
DB Gaines? Wardlow?
At first glance, it appears that we downgrade at WR, stay the same at QB and RB and, without some significant improvement in the offseason to make up for the loss of Sears, will do no better than stay the same on the O-line.
The defense should be better as those younger guys improve but will have some questions in the secondary. We really need one of those D-linemen to get exposed to gamma rays and become a monster by September.
So, does that roster look like a conference or national contender? Have I missed something?