That money is distributed back amongst the NCAA schools. Go find how many athletic departments are self-sustaining. When you look, you will find out that all but about one fourth (depending the given year) or less of all FBS football playing athletic departments operate in the red requiring academics to pick up the slack. Zero non-FBS football playing athletic departments turn a profit... zero.
So what is your BIG picture plan?
Pay only football players? They do not all make a profit and have fun with Title IX legislation.
Pay only programs that turn a profit? Should make 300+ schools upset across the board and again have fun with Title IX legislation.
Want to say piss on Title IX? Have fun losing federal money for the school.
Athletes receive access to state of the art equipment, sport specific training, free food with 3 meals or more a day, access to tutors, academic support that holds their hand like a 4 year old through the whole process, free tuition that could be worth 25K or so a year, medical care for injuries, one on one coaching in their desired sport, personalized nutrition plans, free supplements, advanced networking opportunities not available to other students, and free on-campus housing. However, that is not enough. Damn the facts of athletic department revenue and potential Title IX issues that could wreck all of college athletics as we know it -- we need to pay the millennial generation a wage as well.
Arian Foster is right about some things, and I too hate to see him bashed by Vol fans.
Is the concept of player "unionization" over the top? Yes, it would signal the end of college football as we know it.
But at the very least, college athletes, especially football players who generate millions and millions of dollars for their universities, need to have their full college costs covered (as well as reasonable expenses incurred as a direct result of their participation), especially since more than a few of them sacrifice their very bodies in the process. Anything less is simply not fair.
The whole "suffering Arian Foster/football Player" is BS.Arian Foster is right about some things, and I too hate to see him bashed by Vol fans.
Is the concept of player "unionization" over the top? Yes, it would signal the end of college football as we know it.
But at the very least, college athletes, especially football players who generate millions and millions of dollars for their universities, need to have their full college costs covered (as well as reasonable expenses incurred as a direct result of their participation), especially since more than a few of them sacrifice their very bodies in the process. Anything less is simply not fair.
Arian Foster is right about some things, and I too hate to see him bashed by Vol fans.
Is the concept of player "unionization" over the top? Yes, it would signal the end of college football as we know it.
But at the very least, college athletes, especially football players who generate millions and millions of dollars for their universities, need to have their full college costs covered (as well as reasonable expenses incurred as a direct result of their participation), especially since more than a few of them sacrifice their very bodies in the process. Anything less is simply not fair.
Amusing how so many UT fans who lap up coaching platitudes about being "Vol For Life" are oh so eager to throw our school's all-time leading rusher under the bus because he has the AUDACITY to question the legal and moral sanctity of the NCAA's amateurism rules.
Foster and his classmates generated millions for our university during his time here, and, yes, they were grossly undercompensated for that labor.
The University gets huge grants based on grades, accomplishments, and research done by students in science, math, agriculture, and other fields. Why should the schools be rewarded with all of this money while the students who make this happen are not compensated?:matrix:
On the flip side, if a student is being paid a small amount as a work study or assistant, the players could be paid a small amount for their work in their field. Just a thought.
But, if you start paying athletes, you will eventually kill the goose that is laying the golden egg. Very few athletic departments can pay their own way as it is. If you start paying football players, you will be paying women's softball and soccer players the same amount.