Orange Daddy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 1,671
- Likes
- 212
um Hamilton is gone... you may be next Mr. ButtCheek.There's no plan as of yet because they haven't figured who is going to pony up the cash donations to the athletic department. UT is operating on such a slim budget right now that Hamilton and Cheek know that if they even hinted at taking it out of the general funds there would be a full scale revolt on their hands by both faculty (forced to do more with less) AND students who've been forced to pay more and more and for less services.
It would resemble the student protests of late sixties or worse when Nixon crashed the Billy Graham Crusade at UT back in the day.
"The University of Tennessee does not yet have a plan for how it will finance a multimillion-dollar buyout of former head football coach Derek Dooley, who was fired Sunday, Chancellor Jimmy Cheek said today."
How do you fire someone but have no plan on how to pay him?!!
UT's Cheek: No plan yet for funding coaching buyout » GoVolsXtra
You do know that negotiations over how to structure settlements take a while, right?
I assume that UT is pushing for the following:
- Long, drawn out payments with a caveat that the payments cease as soon as Dooley is hired in a football capacity elsewhere.
I assume that Dooley is pushing for:
- A shorter duration, with larger payments, and no caveat regarding future employment.
UT will probably try to sweeten the deal by offering a higher interest rate; Dooley will probably return with an offer of lower interest on the payments, but larger payments and a shorter lifespan.
I imagine that these negotiations will go back and forth for more than a week.
The buyout payout is already set up in his contract. His buyout is guaranteed even if he coaches elsewhere. There are no negotiations as it was all setup in his 1st contract. The only thing UT is trying to figure out now is how to making the 102,000.00 monthly payments plus hire a new staff.
They are all set up in the hiring contract; and, negotiations over the structure of the settlement still occur upon termination. It happened with Phil; I see no reason as to why it would not be happening with Dooley.
Like I said, I assume that UT will try to sweeten the deal for Dooley by increasing the interest, thus increasing his overall payout, lowering the monthly payments, and providing a rider that says the payments cease once Dooley is hired elsewhere.
Certainly, Dooley can stand by his contract, refuse, and assert that the legally-binding contract obliges UT to pay in the terms that were already agreed to. But, maybe Dooley is also worried that he will not be hired again in a certain football capacity (which the negotiations could and probably would specify more clearly), and, therefore, might want more money over the long haul, but less money in each monthly payment.
Hart and his people will most likely apply a lot of pressure on Dooley and remind Dooley that over six years as a Head Coach, he has only one winning season, a 32-41 overall record, and, in three seasons at UT, has only won four conference games. Hart will attempt to convince Dooley that no Division I team will hire Dooley in the position of either Head Coach or Assistant Head Coach, and, therefore, the long-term higher sum is actually easy money for Dooley.