Not sure if this pic from Ambles is new?

#52
#52
He is gone to USC...showing UNC on one page and Vols on the other to get people thinking...then he thinks he is surprising everyone by goin to USC.
Hopefully it means he's down to UNC and UT but I dont think so...IMO

Don't need him now. We're loaded as of today so don't let him play his game with you. He's a little kid playin' around and Kiffy's his puppet-master.

Hey Markeith, "hook, line and sinker there baby boi"

Da'Freak Rogers and Justin Hunter are the new Wide-Outs at wide-receiver U. Those two plus the rest of our new and improved elite roster means...

"You missed the bus, Gus."
 
#54
#54
I don't even want the guy, he drops alot of easy passes, and appears to be a team cancer........we got Darick, who is faster, bigger, and stronger........agreed, let's go get Stone, Glass, and Robinson, and tell Ambles to go enjoy being on probation with Kiffy-boy.....:eek:lol:

Rogers and Ambles would be a deadly combination...Milton, Hunter, Meline aren't slouches by any means but if you go back and look at Rivals top 3 WR the last 4 or 5 years, they are pretty spot on...we could be looking at having AJ Green and Julio Jones on the same team...you take that man.
 
#56
#56
Rogers and Ambles would be a deadly combination...Milton, Hunter, Meline aren't slouches by any means but if you go back and look at Rivals top 3 WR the last 4 or 5 years, they are pretty spot on...we could be looking at having AJ Green and Julio Jones on the same team...you take that man.

Rogers, Hunter, Milton, and Meline is plenty.......even then Meline prob. goes defense......
 
#57
#57
Don't need him now. We're loaded as of today so don't let him play his game with you. He's a little kid playin' around and Kiffy's his puppet-master.

Hey Markeith, "hook, line and sinker there baby boi"

Da'Freak Rogers and Justin Hunter are the new Wide-Outs at wide-receiver U. Those two plus the rest of our new and improved elite roster means...

"You missed the bus, Gus."

Seriously? We already have a very good WR class, hell, I will go ahead and call it excellent without Ambles, but with him you are talking about the potential to be the best in UT history.
 
#59
#59
Hancock was #87 and wasn't Moore a higher number his freshman and sophmore year...whats the big deal.

most series of numbers refer to position!! not always trua as in single digit receivers but over the years receivers have typically been in the 80s linemen are all over the place( 60S 70S 90S) and quarterbacks typically single digit and teen numbers!!
 
#60
#60
Rogers, Hunter, Milton, and Meline is plenty.......even then Meline prob. goes defense......

You take Ambles, 5* play-maker, if it goes past signing day, maybe we don't sit and wait, we have many glaring needs.

Ambles, Rogers, Milton, Hunter, Meline....we may be throwing the ball....ALOT!
 
#71
#71
Actually, anyone that wants to go out in a route can have numbers ranging from 1-49 and 80 to 99. Most defensive lineman do where 90s but I have seen a couple of 99s as WR over the years in HS. I dont know if the college rules are different but I am pretty sure that they are the same on numbers.
 
#74
#74
Latest tweet from MA. mARKEITHAMBLES who will i be tomorrow a vol, trogan, or tar heel!!!!!!

This just in, its 33.3% chance MA is a VOL tomorrow. Got it from a reliable source. Dont ask me my source, but Ill give you a hint. It was my 7th grade math teacher Mrs. H ---!:)
 

VN Store



Back
Top