now here's the Obama libs love.

#26
#26
lawgator1 said:
Latest I heard was that he was not going to repeal the Bush tax cuts, just let them expire naturally in, what is it, 2010? I also heard though that he might trim the corporate rate. Would think that popular in some circles, though unless he cuts it in half people will still complain its way too high.
Click to expand...

pelosi is wanting to raise everyone's taxes this year and she's made it quite known that's what she wants. i'm sure the next bill sent to hussein o will have plenty of tax raises thus to ensure our economic recovery to be delayed even longer.
 
#28
#28
for taxes. Once as the Employer and again as the employee.

In effect this penalizes anybody who would dare venture out on their own and end up making a success and possibly even hiring others. It just ain't fittin'.:bad:
 
#29
#29
jbakes said:
for taxes. Once as the Employer and again as the employee.

In effect this penalizes anybody who would dare venture out on their own and end up making a success and possibly even hiring others. It just ain't fittin'.:bad:
Click to expand...
I believe there are structures to help avoid it. Talk to a good tax attorney.
 
#30
#30
Cartervol said:
Not surprising. He never said he wouldn't raise taxes either, thats coming next.
Click to expand...

i think you're going to see pelosi really drive the agenda when it comes to raising taxes. hussein is only one brance of government. congress and the senate can both make budgets and include all the tax increases they want.

i don't seen Hussein O vetoing any bills that come his way, unless the republicans take back either the senate or the house in 2010, which is highly unlikely.
 
#31
#31
joevol320 said:
pelosi is wanting to raise everyone's taxes this year and she's made it quite known that's what she wants. i'm sure the next bill sent to hussein o will have plenty of tax raises thus to ensure our economic recovery to be delayed even longer.
Click to expand...


Now you are just making stuff up. Where did she say that?
 
#32
#32
lawgator1 said:
I thought most conservatives supported granting same sex couples benefits and legal rights as long as the couples are not able to be recognized as "married." Was under the impression Obama was compromising on the issue, am I wrong on that?
Click to expand...

Yes Law, you are wrong on that.
 
#33
#33
lawgator1 said:
Now you are just making stuff up. Where did she say that?
Click to expand...

she's said that she doesn't agree with hussein on letting the taxes expire next year. she pretty much called him out and said that she wants to raise taxes much earlier, say this year. her reasoning is that it will put us more in a recession if we don't tax the hell out of companies. (paraphrasing the last part)
 
#34
#34
Can I ask what's so bad about the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act? It's not like it affects most of you in any way, shape, or form.

DOMA
1. No state (or other political subdivision within the United States) need treat a relationship between persons of the same sex as a marriage, even if the relationship is considered a marriage in another state.
2. The Federal Government may not treat same-sex relationships as marriages for any purpose, even if concluded or recognized by one of the state
Click to expand...
s.
 
#35
#35
nickknx865 said:
Can I ask what's so bad about the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act? It's not like it affects most of you in any way, shape, or form.

DOMA
s.
Click to expand...

This is a first step in calling anything anti-homosexual a hate crime. Under a hate crime bill proposed in California a couple of years ago it was considered a hate crime for a preacher to call homosexuality a sin. This quick action so early in his administration sends up all kinds of red flags for what he may either propose or sign off on in the future.
 
#36
#36
Headed For Home said:
This is a first step in calling anything anti-homosexual a hate crime. Under a hate crime bill proposed in California a couple of years ago it was considered a hate crime for a preacher to call homosexuality a sin. This quick action so early in his administration sends up all kinds of red flags for what he may either propose or sign off on in the future.
Click to expand...

Personally, I believe a preacher/reverend should be able to say whatever he damn well pleases, aside from hate speech. If someone wants to call homosexuality a sin, so be it. That isn't who I take my issue up with.

However, saying that legalization of gay marriage will be the first step to calling anything anti-homosexual to a hate crime, IMO, is a bit off. To me, love is love. I ain't gay. I find the thought of two men kissing repulsive in every sense. But it's none of my business to legislate someone's private life.

Up until a few years ago, I had the same position as you did. But, I did some serious thinking about why I came to that position(perversion will be rampant with that sentence) , and I changed my stance.
 
#37
#37
with my beliefs, homosexuality is a sin, and shld not be supported. love the sinner, hate the sin. by giving them the same rights, that's supporting what their lifestyle. to me it's wrong
 
#39
#39
BigPapaVol said:
Isn't there a way to pay a salary as employee of your LLC and avoid the self employment tax?
Click to expand...
My side business has been online retail and I do not sell to anyone in my home state. Basically, I have not had to form any type of corporate entity or obtain a business license. In fact, if I did incorporate, I would have to start paying franchise and exise tax which would just about wipe out all of the profits I now enjoy. I have fun with it, but not enough fun to do it for free.
 
#40
#40
Back to the thread topic though, this whole thing reminds me of the lyrics to the song The Snake. Anyone with a lick of sense knew what was at stake in the last election. If you were dumb enough to vote against your economic interest/cultural morals because it made you feel good then you're gonna get exactly what you derserve, which is a complete reaming.
 
#41
#41
VolunteerHillbilly said:
Back to the thread topic though, this whole thing reminds me of the lyrics to the song The Snake. Anyone with a lick of sense knew what was at stake in the last election. If you were dumb enough to vote against your economic interest/cultural morals because it made you feel good then you're gonna get exactly what you derserve, which is a complete reaming.
Click to expand...
Hard to argue against today.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#42
#42
nickknx865 said:
Personally, I believe a preacher/reverend should be able to say whatever he damn well pleases, aside from hate speech. If someone wants to call homosexuality a sin, so be it. That isn't who I take my issue up with.

However, saying that legalization of gay marriage will be the first step to calling anything anti-homosexual to a hate crime, IMO, is a bit off. To me, love is love. I ain't gay. I find the thought of two men kissing repulsive in every sense. But it's none of my business to legislate someone's private life.

Up until a few years ago, I had the same position as you did. But, I did some serious thinking about why I came to that position(perversion will be rampant with that sentence) , and I changed my stance.
Click to expand...


Perhaps I did not state my point clearly, I was referring more to the inclusion of sexual preference in hate crime legislation.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top