obama calls putin president.

#26
#26
i just don't understand LG's obsession w/ her. she's not pres, or vp. like droski said she has no relevance but he continues to beat a dead horse
 
#27
#27
droski said:
ones the vice president. the other has about as much relavance as paris hilton.
Click to expand...


Palin and Paris Hilton. That's actually a fairly apt comparison.


Vol Mania 21 said:
i just don't understand LG's obsession w/ her. she's not pres, or vp. like droski said she has no relevance but he continues to beat a dead horse
Click to expand...


She's been in the news this week because of her quit... er... resigning for the good of the people of Alaska.
 
#29
#29
the dems keep grasping onto palin and limbaugh because they are scared to death that the republicans are going to make a huge comeback and that obama will be a massive failure. best to confuse the issue and make the face of the republican party people who have zero influence rather than focus on president spends-a-lot's policies.
 
#30
#30
droski said:
the dems keep grasping onto palin and limbaugh because they are scared to death that the republicans are going to make a huge comeback and that obama will be a massive failure. best to confuse the issue and make the face of the republican party people who have zero influence rather than focus on president spends-a-lot's policies.
Click to expand...


If the Republican party suddenly became sane and chose someone with superior fiscal experience and qualifications and who was a moderate on social policy, you'd be right.

But as long as the party is dominated by Limbuahg, Hannity, Palin, Coulter, and Newt Gingrich, they just can't mount a serious challenge.
 
#31
#31
the one thing the repub party doesn't need is another moderate, mccain was def a moderate and if he can't get elected then forget it. they need to get back to a more conservative value.
 
#32
#32
lawgator1 said:
I guess you haven't been reading because I've said now more than a few times on here that I think Biden's losing his mind.

I have the intellectual honesty to say that.

But you lock-step conservatives won't admit the obvious, which is that Palin is flat out ignorant.
Click to expand...

It is not obvious she is ignorant. That's an ignorant statement by you.

Can you not read where I have just said that thought neither were great?
 
#33
#33
JZVOL said:
No, she has.

Look neither of them (Biden, Palin) are great IMO, but to defend Joe and make fun of Sarah is laughable.
Click to expand...

lawgator1 said:
I guess you haven't been reading because I've said now more than a few times on here that I think Biden's losing his mind.

I have the intellectual honesty to say that.

But you lock-step conservatives won't admit the obvious, which is that Palin is flat out ignorant.
Click to expand...

So I guess you missed that part?
 
#34
#34
the mistake they made was nominating such a person. mccain. that was a huge mistake.
 
#35
#35
lawgator1 said:
Somewhat, but I have much more confidence in his experience to pull him through should the need arise than I do Palin and her fishing and Moose-shooting trips.
Click to expand...

he has such experience, History has showed him to be wrong on every issue when it came to defending this country.
 
#36
#36
lawgator1 said:
If the Republican party suddenly became sane and chose someone with superior fiscal experience and qualifications and who was a moderate on social policy, you'd be right.

But as long as the party is dominated by Limbuahg, Hannity, Palin, Coulter, and Newt Gingrich, they just can't mount a serious challenge.
Click to expand...

When was the last time a president like this was elected? Seriously LG?

The closest thing to that guy that has been put forth in the last election was McCain. He wasn't going to win because the timing was wrong.

What we needed after Bush was someone very much like the part in bold above........yet we ended up with Obama.
 
#37
#37
Vol Mania 21 said:
the one thing the repub party doesn't need is another moderate, mccain was def a moderate and if he can't get elected then forget it. they need to get back to a more conservative value.
Click to expand...

droski said:
the mistake they made was nominating such a person. mccain. that was a huge mistake.
Click to expand...


McCain was definitely not as charismatic as Obama was, but I'd have been perfectly content with him winning because I thought he was qualified. I have said that many times.

The Republican party must be on guard however not to just go for someone charismatic for the base but that is going to have all this baggage and who can't stand up well next to an intelligent liberal. The Republicans would be far better off, IMO, with a Mitt Romney type than a Sarah Palin type.
 
#38
#38
lawgator1 said:
McCain was definitely not as charismatic as Obama was, but I'd have been perfectly content with him winning because I thought he was qualified. I have said that many times.

The Republican party must be on guard however not to just go for someone charismatic for the base but that is going to have all this baggage and who can't stand up well next to an intelligent liberal. The Republicans would be far better off, IMO, with a Mitt Romney type than a Sarah Palin type.
Click to expand...

who's the intelligent liberal? hussein's teleprompter?
 
#39
#39
lawgator1 said:
McCain was definitely not as charismatic as Obama was, but I'd have been perfectly content with him winning because I thought he was qualified. I have said that many times.

The Republican party must be on guard however not to just go for someone charismatic for the base but that is going to have all this baggage and who can't stand up well next to an intelligent liberal. The Republicans would be far better off, IMO, with a Mitt Romney type than a Sarah Palin type.
Click to expand...

I don't think many in the repub part would disagree there.
 
#40
#40
once again. sarah palin has NO CHANCE OF WINNING THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION.


and what evidence do you have obama is an intelligent liberal?
 
#41
#41
KB5252 said:
I don't think many in the repub part would disagree there.
Click to expand...


I think you would be shocked at the number of people in the Republican party who would not support Romney because he's LDS versus would support Palin because she's Christian. At least in the primaries and certainly in terms of fund-raising.
 
#44
#44
lawgator1 said:
I think you would be shocked at the number of people in the Republican party who would not support Romney because he's LDS versus would support Palin because she's Christian. At least in the primaries and certainly in terms of fund-raising.
Click to expand...

There may indeed be more that would support her because she was a christian than I would have thought.......but I can guarantee you that you have seriously underestimated those that base their support on what is best for the country. Most Christians today are not the bible thumpers of 25 to 30 years ago.
 
#45
#45
lawgator1 said:
That's unfortunate but I think correct. They are no more a "cult" than any other major religion, IMO.
Click to expand...

they are definetly are the more wacky side if you know much about their beliefs and rituals. in my experience republicans are generally less biased towards mormans than democrats because republicans can respect people of faith.
 
#46
#46
lawgator1 said:
I think you would be shocked at the number of people in the Republican party who would not support Romney because he's LDS versus would support Palin because she's Christian. At least in the primaries and certainly in terms of fund-raising.
Click to expand...

i don't think that's true. you'll see them vote to get this marxist out of office.
 
#47
#47
I actually think it's funny and that Obama just said what was truly on his mind. I mean, does anyone really think Medvedev is in control? I don't.
 
#48
#48
joevol320 said:
i don't think that's true. you'll see them vote to get this marxist out of office.
Click to expand...


Romney's problem wouldn't just be lukewarm support in the general -- it would be emerging from the primary as the nominee versus a religious Christian candidate like Huckabee or Palin.
 
#49
#49
lawgator1 said:
Romney's problem wouldn't just be lukewarm support in the general -- it would be emerging from the primary as the nominee versus a religious Christian candidate like Huckabee or Palin.
Click to expand...

they'll look the whole package, economy, social issues, experience. most will not look at canidates based upon religion.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top