vols4sure
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2006
- Messages
- 1,565
- Likes
- 791
not necessarily, but it has generally taken near disaster for a president to usher in broad and dramatic change in our politics. The worse it gets, unless the problems are ascribed to the head clown, the more likely he is to make a good case for socialization / nationalization and a "level playing field."
What % of people hold absolutely nothing in the market? In the past I would bet that a greater percentage of people did not have any of their actual money in the market and so the market did not directly affect them (obviously it would indirectly affect them greatly but they might have been more blinded by this).
Now with so many people being affected in their 401ks, I just can't see how if the market does not improve, Obama will not be blamed.