ObamaGate

#1,051
#1,051
volprof said:
Sorry your little friends were caught committing treason in my best Forrest Gump, "Sorry I got into a fight in the middle of your Black Panther Party" voice.

Also, this thread is a prime example of what happens when non-experts think they are experts.
Click to expand...

Apparently your so-called experts are exempt from dealing in facts and evidence.

Go back to drawing fan art for your whackjob crush, Louise Mensch
 
#1,052
#1,052
volprof said:
Sorry your little friends were caught committing treason in my best Forrest Gump, "Sorry I got into a fight in the middle of your Black Panther Party" voice.

Also, this thread is a prime example of what happens when non-experts think they are experts.
Click to expand...

Just like you in all your fake TrumpPutinRussia threads
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,055
#1,055
UT_Dutchman said:
Yeah and if you read the paragraph above that one it says the law is basically to vague and that is the real reason she may have not broken the law. I knew someone would try and spin that statement.
Click to expand...

As National Security Adviser she has the clearance to unmask people who are caught communicating with foreign intel asset, and foreign dignitaries who are monitor by U.S. Intelligence as long as it is approved by a senior official at NSA. That's kind of part of the job as National Security Adviser.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,056
#1,056
carlos86 said:
As National Security Adviser she has the clearance to unmask people who are caught communicating with foreign intel asset, and foreign dignitaries who are monitor by U.S. Intelligence as long as it is approved by a senior official at NSA. That's kind of part of the job as National Security Adviser.
Click to expand...

Weren't those rules relaxed in the final year of Obama's administration?
 
#1,057
#1,057
distrovol said:
Weren't those rules relaxed in the final year of Obama's administration?
Click to expand...

From what I've read the NSA directive states:

7.3 B: Field Units and NSA Headquarters Elements. All SIGINT Producing organizations are authorized to disseminate the identities of US persons when

1)The identity is pertinent to the safety of any person or organization

2)The identity is that of an official of the Executive Branch.

3) The person has consented under paragraph 7.2a

Other than those 3 reason it requires the approval of a senior NSA official.
 
#1,059
#1,059
carlos86 said:
As National Security Adviser she has the clearance to unmask people who are caught communicating with foreign intel asset, and foreign dignitaries who are monitor by U.S. Intelligence as long as it is approved by a senior official at NSA. That's kind of part of the job as National Security Adviser.
Click to expand...

To abuse her power for political purposes? No, it's not...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,060
#1,060
golfballs said:
To abuse her power for political purposes? No, it's not...
Click to expand...

If I'm National Security Adviser and I read an NSA report about Individual A. having conversations about Russian sanctions with the Russian Ambassador I would as the questions

1) Who is individual A. and why is he so important that he is talking to the Russian Ambassador

2)How does he relate to the USGOV??? Is he a government official??? He can't be because if he was he would have been identified from the beginning.
 
#1,061
#1,061
carlos86 said:
If I'm National Security Adviser and I read an NSA report about Individual A. having conversations about Russian sanctions with the Russian Ambassador I would as the questions

1) Who is individual A. and why is he so important that he is talking to the Russian Ambassador

2)How does he relate to the USGOV??? Is he a government official??? He can't be because if he was he would have been identified from the beginning.
Click to expand...

The reports supposedly didn't have anything to do with the Russians.
 
#1,062
#1,062
carlos86 said:
If I'm National Security Adviser and I read an NSA report about Individual A. having conversations about Russian sanctions with the Russian Ambassador I would as the questions

1) Who is individual A. and why is he so important that he is talking to the Russian Ambassador

2)How does he relate to the USGOV??? Is he a government official??? He can't be because if he was he would have been identified from the beginning.
Click to expand...

Nunes has faced criticism from Democrats for viewing pertinent documents on White House grounds and announcing their contents to the press. But sources said “the intelligence agencies slow-rolled Nunes. He could have seen the logs at other places besides the White House SCIF [secure facility], but it had already been a few weeks. So he went to the White House because he could protect his sources and he could get to the logs.”

As the Obama administration left office, it also approved new rules that gave the NSA much broader powers by relaxing the rules about sharing intercepted personal communications and the ability to share those with 16 other intelligence agencies.

From the Fox News article
 
#1,063
#1,063
distrovol said:
Nunes has faced criticism from Democrats for viewing pertinent documents on White House grounds and announcing their contents to the press. But sources said “the intelligence agencies slow-rolled Nunes. He could have seen the logs at other places besides the White House SCIF [secure facility], but it had already been a few weeks. So he went to the White House because he could protect his sources and he could get to the logs.”

As the Obama administration left office, it also approved new rules that gave the NSA much broader powers by relaxing the rules about sharing intercepted personal communications and the ability to share those with 16 other intelligence agencies.

From the Fox News article
Click to expand...

This whole thing is/was political. Obama was trying to find anything criminal he could for political purposes to protect his agenda.
 
#1,064
#1,064
114VOL said:
Scratch golfers aren't nearly good enough for Q-school
Click to expand...
Most people have no idea how good the tour pros are. Being a decent amateur golfer,I have played with several local pros and top amateurs, and one 13 time winner on the PGA Tour. Playing with a tour pro is like playing basketball with Michael Jordan. These guys are good!

Unless a golfer completely dominates golf in his area, and wins pretty much every regional event by a good margin, he most likely has zero chance of making it through Q School.
 
#1,066
#1,066
1972 Grad said:
Most people have no idea how good the tour pros are. Being a decent amateur golfer,I have played with several local pros and top amateurs, and one 13 time winner on the PGA Tour. Playing with a tour pro is like playing basketball with Michael Jordan. These guys are good!

Unless a golfer completely dominates golf in his area, and wins pretty much every regional event by a good margin, he most likely has zero chance of making it through Q School.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I've played in 3 USGA national events in my lifetime. In college, I played with and against several guys who played the regular tour and now the senior tour. If you're ready for Q-school, you should routinely be shooting in the mid to high 60s on courses like Holston Hills, Fox Den and the Virginian
 
#1,069
#1,069
114VOL said:
Exactly. I've played in 3 USGA national events in my lifetime. In college, I played with and against several guys who played the regular tour and now the senior tour. If you're ready for Q-school, you should routinely be shooting in the mid to high 60s on courses like Holston Hills, Fox Den and the Virginian
Click to expand...
The big difference in tour players and good amateurs becomes very noticeable on a really tough golf course. Very few local hotshots would be able to break 80 on a U.S. Open course. Some wouldn't break 90.
 
#1,070
#1,070
distrovol said:
Nunes has faced criticism from Democrats for viewing pertinent documents on White House grounds and announcing their contents to the press. But sources said “the intelligence agencies slow-rolled Nunes. He could have seen the logs at other places besides the White House SCIF [secure facility], but it had already been a few weeks. So he went to the White House because he could protect his sources and he could get to the logs.”

As the Obama administration left office, it also approved new rules that gave the NSA much broader powers by relaxing the rules about sharing intercepted personal communications and the ability to share those with 16 other intelligence agencies.

From the Fox News article
Click to expand...

Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. Been in a few.
 
#1,075
#1,075
This keeps getting better

http://yournewswire.com/democrat-rats-on-obama-spying-trump-2015/



#2
Evelyn Farkas, an Obama administration insider, has become the latest Democrat to roll over and squeal on her former comrades, telling MSNBC that she helped spy on Trump for Obama before he left office, and that Trump, not Russians, was the target of the illegal surveillance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top