golfballs
Mostly Peaceful Poster
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 75,414
- Likes
- 57,668
it doesn't require a high-level conspiracy at all. However, Sheriff Joe should be concentrating on keeping Maricopa safe instead
The Washington Times is owned by a Muslim sympathizer. You know that, right?
Following shocking contradictions discovered by criminal investigators between the contents of the forged digital image of Obamas alleged 1961 Certificate of Live Birth posted on the internet and long-standing federal vital records regulations, the State of Hawaii now refuses to verify that the digital image matches the paper record in their files.
------------------
Then, at the very moment Obama, or most likely someone on his staff, posted a digital image of an unauthorized .pdf version of an alleged State of Hawaii issued birth certificate to an official government media source in April, 2011, a crime was committed.
------------------------
During the course of the investigation, Maricopa County Sheriff CCP lead investigator, Mike Zullo, asked Hawaiis Deputy Attorney General, Jill Nagamine, to validate the information about Obamas birth on the internet image by corroborating it with the contents of the original paper version of the birth record filed with the State of Hawaii.
Nagamine refused to do so.
------------
Commenting on Nagamines response, Zullo said, Essentially, what she was telling us is that the internet image is not what they released to Obamas attorneys.
--------------------
Zullo continued, Based on that exchange, we verified that the state of Hawaii did not make a .pdf file of Obamas birth certificate. If the Department of Health in Hawaii did not release this .pdf computer generated file and this is not merely a photograph of a document, someone else created it!
That is forgery!
-------------------
You could not take this document image into a court room and have it accepted as authentic by a judge.
Article 2 Super PAC has placed an explosive ad on the front section, back page of today's Washington Times, quoting Cold Case Posse Lead Investigator Mike Zullo, "It's time for this charade to stop!"
Unificationism and Islam
There it is. The owner of the Washington Times recognizes Islam as completely legitimate and that Muhammed is a messenger of God.
Wait a minute here. Sheriff Joe and his Cold Case Posse are using taxpayer money to fund their investigation? Anyone else see anything wrong with that?
So what does that have to do with Obama's constitutional qualifications, or lack thereof to be president?
FWIW, how about Sikhism and the Bahai faith, Moon seems to ignore them?
At any rate, if you accept the unification doctrine as espoused by Moon, you can't say Moon is out to get Obama because Barry is a moslem.
FWIW, I don't care that much for Moon or his views, but then I can't say that Sulzberger is the least bit better, probably worse, as well as his gay friends at WAPO.
What do you think is wrong with it?
Do you think Holder spending taxpayer money to stop Sheriff Joe from enforceing the law in his county is wrong?
![]()
Washington Times owned by Moon, the founder of the Unification Church. You can do your own homework on the Unification Church and its stance on Islam.
Does it matter in the context of my question? Is it okay or is it not okay to use taxpayer money to wage a personal mission? It's a yes or no question. Answer yes or no. No more deflection.