I've watched Pa. state's last two games--against west virginia and rutgers--and they were nearly flawless in each game. Impressive--extremely well coached. It was good that there were able to take advantage of that rutgers mistake and score an earlyish goal; otherwise, it might have been another 0-0 score. And you are right: Pa. state is brilliant at finding open players, extremely well organized--they showed that against a /very/ athletic west virginia team. I think they do have some good athletes in midfield and a couple of players up front with very good pace. What is doubly remarkable about their back four is that they are 3 sophs and a freshman.
UT's back four was two seniors, a junior and a soph and not nearly good enough: the players were not technical enough and not composed enough. We need to improve technically, and I'll be curious to see who starts for this team next year. Not impressed by coaching decisions last year--formation, personnel. Marcano should have played tons more--crazy. We're a goal down to florida in the second half and the coach sticks with weak attacking personnel, including a holding mid who played the entire 90. The switches made for the S.C. game after Flynn's injury violated the rule that you never make more position changes than necessary. Examples....On to next year.
Florida State is a bit annoying with all their internationals--not because they have internationals, but because their coach has made Intls, the focal point of his program--5 starting last year and 5 this year. It's pretty common to have 1--but 5 is half your field team. The internationals are typically a year older than their U.S. counterparts--19/20-year freshman--and have pro experience in Europe. It is advantage, for sure--as evidenced by the fact that they've been bossing excellent uva and unc programs the last couple of years. However, as I write this, duke is beating fsu--scored against run of play. I hope they can prevail.