After looking at the stats and information from the game last night and what all the talking heads said all week here are some of my thoughts.
Many were upset that the betting odds were set at 9.5 points.
- Those odds got the Vols believers to bet.
- In the end, the odds worked out for the gambling sites since the final was 14 points.
They said all week that UGA’s D.B.s couldn’t cover, specifically the deep ball. That turned out not to be true.
- The Vols longest pass play was 17 yards, with two others at 13 & 14.
- We moved the chains with short passes, but only amassed 167 total yards passing.
- Thornton had a huge drop again that hit him right in both hands. Not sure if he was concentrating on trying to get both feet in bounds, or if he had T-Rex arms thinking he was going to get hit. Regardless he has to make those catches.
They said all week that UGA’s O-Line couldn’t protect Beck. Beck was sacked 5 times against Ole Miss and had several force fumbles.
- The Vols had ZERO sacks and only 3 maybe 4 hurries. Those hurries turned into first down runs by Beck.
- Beck had 347 yards through the air with ZERO interceptions. He had all night to throw the ball.
- Initially they had a lot of quick passes behind or at the line of scrimmage to help the O-Line. A very good strategy.
They said all week that the UGA receivers could catch.
- This one turned out to be true. Specifically, #11 had a lot of drops.
- The T.E.’s, however, made every catch and piled up the yards as Kirby’s teams are known to do.
The first half was a hard-fought half, and it had the making of a fantastic finish. I appeared that UGA changed their game plan at the half and that proved to be trouble for the Vols. We didn’t adjust well to the new offensive and defensive strategies.
UGA had not allowed a 100-yard rusher all season. D. Samp. had 101 yards with 27 being the longest. The Vols won the rushing game 152 to 106. Beck was the second leading rusher with 32 yards. Frazier had 62.
They said that UGA gave up a lot of yards rushing specifically on the outside. The Vols never run outside. D. Samp. bounced it outside a couple of times for good yardage, but the runs are typically up the middle. I can only assume that CJH doesn’t have a strategy for outside running plays. We very seldom run screens, and seldom run sweeps to crossing W.R.s.
In the end the Vols have to win out to have a chance, but that is true for many teams. There will be more losses by top teams due to conference championship games. It feels like Tennessee may be last year’s Florida State. There is still some ball to be played and we have to win out to have a shot, plain and simple.
If we had not had the slip up at Arkansas we wouldn’t be having this conversation. We cannot have the same slip up with a feisty Vandy team that will be looking to win their yearly Super Bowl. We should be able to rest some of our banged-up players next week versus UTEP (2-8).
Most had us losing to UGA in the pre-season, plus one other. The other wasn’t Arkansas though. The good news is this one hurts because the Vols had a punchers chance to win.
I don’t know how the season will play out, but GO BIG ORANGE!
You wrote:
- The Vols had ZERO sacks and only 3 maybe 4 hurries. Those hurries turned into first down runs by Beck.
- Beck had 347 yards through the air with ZERO interceptions. He had all night to throw the ball.
I believe the UGA O-lineman average weight, which was very uniform was 315 pounds and they were healthier than the previous weeks because injuries are healing or heeled. The weights were from a very brief display of pics of UGA O-line very early in the game. "Healthier" is from Dawgnation on Youtube.
If you watch any NFL, compare their O-line with UGAs and you'll see UGA is pretty much a professional O-line.
It's why I believe Beck had so much time last night, meaning; it wasn't failure on UT's part, but more a credit to what UGA had going for them last night.
According to Dawgnation that has former players on as guests: Kirby and Bobo go into every game with 3 offensive schemes. One used exclusively in the first half and the second and perhaps a third used in the second half. This gives the coaches the opportunity to switch strategies mid 2nd half if needed and the players are ready for either to be used.
The football forum is not happy with Heupel, but I think he's very good and look how fast he turned around the Vols. Most fans tend to be too impatient with coaches, but changing a program is a process, not an event. (I rarely look at the football forum because what they want is what they expect and they want it right now. UT is poised to be a great football program and I think it's one of the few to have figured out how to take full advantage of the Portal and NIL.
Aside: I believe Vitello has proven he too knows how to take full advantage of the Portal and NIL. UT fans might want to reflect on how good the coaching is and that very good players from both sports are attending UT because of those coaches.