volbound1700
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2007
- Messages
- 8,681
- Likes
- 12,096
Exactly...take for example UT.
NCAA and the schools get more cash and exposure from sitting 60k in Indy versus like 15k in TBA.
If you like pure basketball, defense, and playing below the rim, the women’s game has it all.No one would show up to women’s games in first rounds, that’s why
Why don't the higher seeds get to play at home like the Women do for first two rounds? I would think it is a stronger reward for a team's performance during the regular season.
The question was why do women get home games in the NCAA tournament but not the men. My answer was if the women were not at home then very few fans would travel to games away. Obviously if the men had rounds at home the gyms would be sold out!Ugh... you don't think Kentucky fans would show up for games in Lexington or UNC fans in Chapel Hill?
The question was why do women get home games in the NCAA tournament but not the men. My answer was if the women were not at home then very few fans would travel to games away. Obviously if the men had rounds at home the gyms would be sold out!
READ your question in order to understand my original answer!
Got it, it wasn't explained very well.
Why is the NBA playoffs played at home arenas as well? NCAA Men's Basketball is the only major playoff system that is 100% neutral. Even Baseball has its early rounds at home fields.
Ugh... you don't think Kentucky fans would show up for games in Lexington or UNC fans in Chapel Hill?
I look at it as rewarding a good season, not a gimmick. Yes you’d have lower attendance but a lot of those early rounds aren’t full arenas anyway and TV viewership is where the money lies. Division II does it. They also have certain regions already slated to play each other based on geography once you get to the Sweet 16. I like their setup better than Division I.The men don't need gimmicks. That's why.
I look at it as rewarding a good season, not a gimmick. Yes you’d have lower attendance but a lot of those early rounds aren’t full arenas anyway and TV viewership is where the money lies. Division II does it. They also have certain regions already slated to play each other based on geography once you get to the Sweet 16. I like their setup better than Division I.
For me it has nothing to do with UT. I think it would be cool for the top 4 seeds to host. I love the idea of getting games on campuses.It's an attendance gimmick. The way it's done now generates more excitement. It's funny how when a team takes an L the excuses and alternative ideas start coming out how to prevent this in the future.
For me it has nothing to do with UT. I think it would be cool for the top 4 seeds to host. I love the idea of getting games on campuses.