txvolsfangatorh8r
romans 8:28
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2008
- Messages
- 2,098
- Likes
- 0
lot easier to explain away mediocrity in the "mighty" sec
I don't blame Texas for not wanting to come to the SEC. They are scared of the competition. Oklahoma on the other hand is embarrassing themselves. It's sad that a program like that is beholden to Texas. Essentially saying Texas is their daddy.
I don't blame Texas for not wanting to come to the SEC. They are scared of the competition. Oklahoma on the other hand is embarrassing themselves. It's sad that a program like that is beholden to Texas. Essentially saying Texas is their daddy.
McEnroe was never the same after Borg retired. Ali never reached the same level of performance without Frazier to push him. Bobby Fisher lost his mind without Boris Spasky to compete against. OU knows the value of having a rival against whom every game is Armageddon. Why split that up?i agree. whats with al this 'we have to follow texas BS"? i mean since when did a public university become allowed to dictate what other schools (even schools from a different state) are allowed to do. its quite embarrasing.
as for tech i can see why they are jumping all over the coattails of texas. they have to or they will become another utep. but OU?
it's done. only question is if a&M is too stupid to come our way because they are afraid of the west coast
McEnroe was never the same after Borg retired. Ali never reached the same level of performance without Frazier to push him. Bobby Fisher lost his mind without Boris Spasky to compete against. OU knows the value of having a rival against whom every game is Armageddon. Why split that up?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
In the current economic climate in college sports, why in the world would any power school put themselves in a position where they are playing a neutral field nonconference game every year?i totally agree with this. however why does it ALWAYS have to be the same team? why cant OU find another one like say arkansas or LSU or bama? and the same for texas - they could start with arizona or say ucla. why do they always have to stick w the same?
or why does this armageddon need to be a conference game? they played before the big 12 was formed. why cant they keep that intact outside of a conference game. im sure the pac 10 would allow them the ability to schedule OU outside the conference schedule
In the current economic climate in college sports, why in the world would any power school put themselves in a position where they are playing a neutral field nonconference game every year?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
They talked about making it a home and home series in the '80s. Both fan bases raised mortal Hell. They like it as it is and has been for the last 60 or so years. It's far simpler to stay in the same league. Also, Stoops love the idea of having more access to California. He's already had some pretty good success recruiting there.why the neutral feild? it should go back to norman/austin rotating and become a real rivalry. it shouldnt matter then.
they can hype as the rivalry and instead of giving up the money, have the home home aspect and justify keeping the game. it wouldnt affect the conference record, keep the "recruiting" aspect going for OU and both would come out ahead. with OU leaving they could possibly even play more than once a year with bowl games
Texas is considered the linchpin to the Big 12's survival, particularly after the league lost Nebraska (Big Ten) and Colorado (Pac-10) in a matter of two days this week. The Texas regents said they will hold a meeting in Austin on Tuesday for "discussion and appropriate action regarding athletic conference membership."
Iowa State president Gregory Geoffroy said the future of the Big 12 was up to Texas.
"If the University of Texas were to decide that they want to be a member of the Big 12, then I'm confident the Big 12 would stay together," he said. "If the University of Texas decides they do not wish to and wish to do something else, then I think the conference will be greatly altered."