Agree.I can't believe this is still a question.
Worley will be the starter. How is this hard for anyone to grasp??
The Tennessee team that went to OT with Georgia, then beat South Carolina, would have hammered Vandy last night. What's the difference between that team and the crap on the field last night? The QB.
We are a better team with Worley in the game. How that is still a question is beyond me.
I can't believe this is still a question.
Worley will be the starter. How is this hard for anyone to grasp??
The Tennessee team that went to OT with Georgia, then beat South Carolina, would have hammered Vandy last night. What's the difference between that team and the crap on the field last night? The QB.
The only bad thing about our offense last night was Dobbs. We are a better team with Worley in the game. How that is still a question is beyond me.
We had better go out and get a JUCO QB like Auburn does. It could have been a different season if our QB play hadn't been so woefully inept.
Had Riley Ferguson not been injured when Worley went down, he probably would have been the QB but Dobbs was the only choice at the time, but, as CBJ said in the sports section of today's paper, with only one game left, it wasn't worth burning his redshirt. I expect he will be battling Worley for the job next spring.
So we can have a first year starter in this system again? You guys are awfully quick to get down on a freshman qb playing in the best conference, with absolutely no help from his receivers.
This is what gets me when it comes to Dobbs. The kid can pass the ball ten times and screw up on nine of them. Then when he makes that one good throw and the receiver drops it, everyone blames his shortcomings on the receivers.