Out of Shadows, Into the Light, and an Introduction to 5th Gen Warfare.

#1
Sgt_Nick_Fury

Sgt_Nick_Fury

Danneskjöld's love child.
Joined
Oct 2, 2010
Messages
11,544
Likes
17,714
#1
Because it's past time. Making thread to first link these movies, and some powerful videos associated with the subject of 5gw. Most people are comepletely unaware of the war escalating around them. You can't defend yourself if you do not know you are under attack, or even what the weapons would look like. Feel free to post your own links on 5thGW as well. Trolls welcome too, maybe you'll learn something about why you can't meme and are so bad at this, and why it's so ironic you accuse others of being amatuers. :D

First Movie:
Out Of Shadows Official (2020) - Documentary Exposing Satanism in High Places
 
#3
#3
This one is more tricky it has come out recently, and there is a full court press to surpress. Including making different documentaries with the same name, shutting down links etc. Will put multple ways to watch. No gaurantee how long they last.

Second Movie:

Official site. (paid donation to watch small amount) Into The Light

A Rumble guys channel who posted entire movie as apart of his "watch party", I do not in anyway support him, and think he's maybe a little off to be honest, but you can ignore him and start watch actual movie at around 18:20 but he will stop and start it a couple of times....still it's free.
WATCH PARTY - INTO THE LIGHT
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#5
#5
Does this have anything to do with the 2 up 2 down you wouldn’t explain to me ?
 
#6
#6
Boone Cutler is an Iraq War veteran who worked in psyops he has a previous book "Callsign Voodoo" that breaks down his day to day job in psyops in Iraq, and how psyops were applied to the local population. Remember that Psyops and 5th Gen warfare is neither good or evil, rather a new form of warfare in which all the different sides are now currently engaged. If you want to break down "Clown World" and what is happening this is basically a military manual written for civilians on how to understand. You are being targeted on TV, Social media, video games, music, your shopping websites, EVERYTHING you touch that is media is breaking you down into a psychological profile to be targeted and manipulated. More over now thanks to AI it is ALL coordinated and individually adjusted to YOU. This is a manual to understand the process, and what those in the various world psyop organizations already know. You can't defend yourself, when you do not even know how you are under attack, and you have no voice if you can't speak the same language as others


Interview:



His Book on 5GW
51VII1GVrsL._SY498_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
On Amazon at B0BN79NWZF
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sudden Impact
#7
#7
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
Boone Cutler is an Iraq War veteran who worked in psyops he has a previous book "Callsign Voodoo" that breaks down his day to day job in psyops in Iraq, and how psyops were applied to the local population. Remember that Psyops and 5th Gen warfare is neither good or evil, rather a new form of warfare in which all the different sides are now currently engaged. If you want to break down "Clown World" and what is happening this is basically a military manual written for civilians on how to understand. You are being targeted on TV, Social media, video games, music, your shopping websites, EVERYTHING you touch that is media is breaking you down into a psychological profile to be targeted and manipulated. More over now thanks to AI it is ALL coordinated and individually adjusted to YOU. This is a manual to understand the process, and what those in the various world psyop organizations already know. You can't defend yourself, when you do not even know how you are under attack, and you have no voice if you can't speak the same language as others


Interview:



His Book on 5GW
View attachment 569449
On Amazon at B0BN79NWZF
Click to expand...

No offense, you sound completely unhinged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11, flint and Septic
#10
#10
Who probably knows more a bitter sycophant who parrots political demogogue's on a sports forum, or the guy that was in the Seat of National Security Advisor, and the leader defense intelligence Agency?

I'm not asking anyone here to listen to Sgt_Nick_fury on a sports forum, or even my opinion on the matter. We can argue and discuss our opinions ad nauseam later. I'm saying before you can even discuss it, you have to educate yourself on what IT (5GW) is. I'm saying perhaps you want to listen to the guys who have a leadership background in Millitary Intelligence and the Psyops veteran when discussing 5th Generation Warfare. More then any politician, and more then any celebrity, more then any newscaster these are the men whose bread and butter was this battlefield, and this new method of warfare. Their expertise is taken serious by serious people, and there's no reason to take unserious people seriously.

Tell yourself now how you zinged me.

You can choose ignorance, but it is your choice to do so.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#11
#11
I'm subscribed to Robert Malone's substacks. (For those who dont know, he is one of the inventors of MRNA technologies). He has been talking a lot about 5th generation warfare recently and here is today's substack. I don't think any of us can fully comprehend 5GW unless we are actually a "somebody" who is having a small amount of succes making to much noise going against the machine.

Hate Ecosystem and Fifth Gen Warfare (Part IV)

Edit: I should have said he was one of the inventors of MRNA technologies. He is not the imventor of MRNA vaccines. Like many technologies, the development of the mRNA vaccines was a collaborative effort that spanned a number of research institutes, three decades of work, and hundreds of researchers. Robert Malone contributed to the early development of this vaccine technology, however he is not the sole inventor of mRNA vaccines
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and Sgt_Nick_Fury
#14
#14
Orangeslice13 said:
Does this have anything to do with the 2 up 2 down you wouldn’t explain to me ?
Click to expand...
No that was merely finding someone's reference funny, accidental symbolism. But by merely asking that here shows you probably get the reference, and can surmise why I was amused.
 
#15
#15
VolinWayne said:
I'm subscribed to Robert Malone's substacks. (For those who dont know, he is one of the inventors of MRNA vaccines). He has been talking a lot about 5th generation warfare recently and here is today's substack. I don't think any of us can fully comprehend 5GW unless we are actually a "somebody" who is having a small amount of succes making to much noise going against the machine.

Hate Ecosystem and Fifth Gen Warfare (Part IV)
Click to expand...
No he’s not.
He worked on a team that worked on the project. He wasn’t even a team leader.
He didn’t help himself with people like me who think the truth is more important than what I want to believe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and flint
#16
#16
Orangeslice13 said:
No he’s not.
He worked on a team that worked on the project. He wasn’t even a team leader.
He didn’t help himself with people like me who think the truth is more important than what I want to believe.
Click to expand...


That is the truth you choose to believe. You can have whatever opinion you want of Dr Robert Malone but to say that he is not one of the inventors of MRNA technology is a false statement. He has done years of research starting in the 80s and his name is on multiple patents. Click on the link below and see all the work he has done in regards to MRNA technology.

Robert W Malone, MD


Who is an inventor?

Any person who has made an inventive contribution to an invention has the right to be named as an inventor. Details of an inventor are included in a patent application when it is published, and once again when it is published as a granted patent. Unlike authorship on academic papers, where any person who has contributed to the published research is usually named as an author, naming a person as an inventor on a patent application requires that the person made an inventive contribution to the invention as claimed. In determining inventorship, the key question is who conceived of the invention, as opposed to who reduced the invention to practice.

Identification of inventors for a patent application is a critical step in the process. Here we discuss some of the issues around the correct identification of inventors - PurdyLucey
 
Last edited:
#17
#17
VolinWayne said:
That is the truth you choose to believe. To say that he is not one of the inventors of MRNA technology is a false statement. He has done years of research starting in the 80s and his name is on multiple patents. Click on the link below and see all the work he has done in regards to MRNA technology.

Robert W Malone, MD


Who is an inventor?

Any person who has made an inventive contribution to an invention has the right to be named as an inventor. Details of an inventor are included in a patent application when it is published, and once again when it is published as a granted patent. Unlike authorship on academic papers, where any person who has contributed to the published research is usually named as an author, naming a person as an inventor on a patent application requires that the person made an inventive contribution to the invention as claimed. In determining inventorship, the key question is who conceived of the invention, as opposed to who reduced the invention to practice.

Identification of inventors for a patent application is a critical step in the process. Here we discuss some of the issues around the correct identification of inventors - PurdyLucey
Click to expand...


This destroys your credibility.
Misrepresenting your accomplishments and facts means you can’t be trusted in all your assertions.
I take the same issue with with the climate change cult.
They have been caught misrepresenting their data twice. They are exactly the same as Dr Malone. Who also misrepresents the absolute fact that Covid spike proteins cause the side effects and not any other part of the vaccine. If you had Covid you are exactly equally likely to have side effects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#19
#19
Looks like you’re a victim of 5GW where Dr Malone is the weapon used against you in a targeted campaign to create divide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#20
#20
Orangeslice13 said:
This destroys your credibility.
Misrepresenting your accomplishments and facts means you can’t be trusted in all your assertions.
I take the same issue with with the climate change cult.
They have been caught misrepresenting their data twice. They are exactly the same as Dr Malone. Who also misrepresents the absolute fact that Covid spike proteins cause the side effects and not any other part of the vaccine. If you had Covid you are exactly equally likely to have side effects.
Click to expand...


Did you even click on the link that leads to his name being on multiple patents? You are wrong and you know it Slice and there really is not even an argument to be made here. For what it's worth, I did not say he was (the inventor).
 
#21
#21
VolinWayne said:
Did you even click on the link that leads to his name being on multiple patents? You are wrong and you know it Slice and there really is not even an argument to be made here. For what it's worth, I did not say he was (the inventor).
Click to expand...
You get that’s fake right. if you search the patents by number it’s not there.
Edit: he’s not “one of…” either. Not his idea. Not his intellectual property. He worked on a team for the inventors. And there’s nothing wrong with presenting himself that way. He’d have more credibility if he had gone with the truth.
But …..he didn’t make any money off of the vaccine so he had to cash in somehow
My wife worked at a personal injury law firm as an RN paralegal.
They looked at several different cases around this subject. And Dr Malone could not be called as a “credible witness” for anything. In fact his presence would “harm” the case.

there are a couple of things people who are programmed say.
One obvious one is “I hope and pray this never harms you or your family” several of the Covid vaccine obsessed have said this to me. Once again, they are just as likely to have issues as I am. Another is naming yourself in an effort to confirm to yourself that your beliefs are correct. (Self affirmation) does the term “true blood” ring any bells. The third is another self affirmation technique that you just used when your beliefs are challenged. It traditionally goes “I’m right, and you know it” but your “you’re wrong and you know it” is basically the same thing. That is typically the sign of somebody in an incorrect position but unwilling to take an objective look at evidence as it threatens their programed position.

but I digress.


Edit 2:
He does have his name on patents. Just nothing involving the creation of the MNRA vaccines
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#22
#22
Orangeslice13 said:
You get that’s fake right. if you search the patents by number it’s not there.
Edit: he’s not “one of…” either. Not his idea. Not his intellectual property. He worked on a team for the inventors. And there’s nothing wrong with presenting himself that way. He’d have more credibility if he had gone with the truth.
But …..he didn’t make any money off of the vaccine so he had to cash in somehow
My wife worked at a personal injury law firm as an RN paralegal.
They looked at several different cases around this subject. And Dr Malone could not be called as a “credible witness” for anything. In fact his presence would “harm” the case.

there are a couple of things people who are programmed say.
One obvious one is “I hope and pray this never harms you or your family” several of the Covid vaccine obsessed have said this to me. Once again, they are just as likely to have issues as I am. Another is naming yourself in an effort to confirm to yourself that your beliefs are correct. (Self affirmation) does the term “true blood” ring any bells. The third is another self affirmation technique that you just used when your beliefs are challenged. It traditionally goes “I’m right, and you know it” but your “you’re wrong and you know it” is basically the same thing. That is typically the sign of somebody in an incorrect position but unwilling to take an objective look at evidence as it threatens their programed position.

but I digress.
Click to expand...


First of all, you are the one who started this argument with your statement of "no he's not" in regards to Dr. Robert Malone being an inventor of MRNA technologies. This makes your statement about me saying “you’re wrong and you know it” a bit hypocritical don't you think.

Below are just a few of the many links that prove that he did indeed spend years of doing research and studies on MRNA technologies. Does this not qualify him as "an inventor" (not the inventor) ov MRNA technogies?

https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.86.16.6077

Google Scholar

Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo

Delivery of exogenous DNA sequences in a mammal

Induction of a protective immune response in a mammal by injecting a DNA sequence

Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection.

Generation of antibodies through lipid mediated DNA delivery

Theory and in vivo application of electroporative gene delivery

https://www.cell.com/molecular-therapy-family/molecular-therapy/fulltext/S1525-0016(00)90124-2

Induction of a protective immune response in a mammal by injecting a DNA sequence

Since Dr. Malone has taken the stance of the MRNA vaccines not being totally safe and ready for use in humans there has been a huge campaign to disregard everything that Malone has accomplished (a prime example of 5th generation warfare). Look at what a few of his colleagues had to say about him.

https://www.10news.com/news/in-depth/in-depth-did-robert-malone-invent-mrna-vaccines-in-san-diego

Some former colleagues feel Malone deserves recognition for conceptualizing the experiments.

“There were a half-dozen people at Vical who really contributed to this,” said one Vical employee. “But who was the brainchild? Who came up with the idea? It was Robert [Malone].”
 
#23
#23
VolinWayne said:
First of all, you are the one who started this argument with your statement of "no he's not" in regards to Dr. Robert Malone being an inventor of MRNA technologies. This makes your statement about me saying “you’re wrong and you know it” a bit hypocritical don't you think.

And Slice stopped reading….
Click to expand...
It’s not an argument.
It’s a discussion.
A discussion in a thread about programming people…..ironically

And…..it’s an observation based on my psychology background. Look it up. I’m not pulling that observation from my ass.

(edit: you ….mcFurry…and most others in this type of discussion are not loother, BB or the other goober. I assumed we could discuss this reasonably. If I’m wrong let me know).

The rest of that doesn’t contradict that he’s misrepresented himself and been misrepresented. Had he gone with his actual qualifications then he would not be considered “not credible” by the lawyers who would love a class action suit.

And before you say the pharmaceutical companies have immunity….they actually don’t if malfeasance can be proven. So once again the guys loose grasp on the truth harms your position instead of helping it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83, VolinWayne and StarRaider
#24
#24
Orangeslice13 said:
You get that’s fake right. if you search the patents by number it’s not there.
Edit: he’s not “one of…” either. Not his idea. Not his intellectual property. He worked on a team for the inventors. And there’s nothing wrong with presenting himself that way. He’d have more credibility if he had gone with the truth.
But …..he didn’t make any money off of the vaccine so he had to cash in somehow
My wife worked at a personal injury law firm as an RN paralegal.
They looked at several different cases around this subject. And Dr Malone could not be called as a “credible witness” for anything. In fact his presence would “harm” the case.

there are a couple of things people who are programmed say.
One obvious one is “I hope and pray this never harms you or your family” several of the Covid vaccine obsessed have said this to me. Once again, they are just as likely to have issues as I am. Another is naming yourself in an effort to confirm to yourself that your beliefs are correct. (Self affirmation) does the term “true blood” ring any bells. The third is another self affirmation technique that you just used when your beliefs are challenged. It traditionally goes “I’m right, and you know it” but your “you’re wrong and you know it” is basically the same thing. That is typically the sign of somebody in an incorrect position but unwilling to take an objective look at evidence as it threatens their programed position.

but I digress.


Edit 2:
He does have his name on patents. Just nothing involving the creation of the MNRA vaccines
Click to expand...


Here are a few of his patents that have to do with MRNA technologies

US Patent Application for Compounds and methods for enhancing delivery of free polynucleotide Patent Application (Application #20040009947 issued January 15, 2004) - Justia Patents Search

US Patent for DNA vaccines for eliciting a mucosal immune response Patent (Patent # 6,110,898 issued August 29, 2000) - Justia Patents Search

US Patent for Formulations and methods for generating active cytofectin: polynucleotide transfection complexes Patent (Patent # 5,925,623 issued July 20, 1999) - Justia Patents Search

US Patent for Cationic transport reagents Patent (Patent # 5,892,071 issued April 6, 1999) - Justia Patents Search

US Patent for Polyfunctional cationic cytofectins, formulations and methods for generating active cytofectin: polynucleotide transfection complexes Patent (Patent # 5,824,812 issued October 20, 1998) - Justia Patents Search

US Patent for Cationic transport reagents Patent (Patent # 5,744,625 issued April 28, 1998) - Justia Patents Search

US Patent for Induction of a protective immune response in a mammal by injecting a DNA sequence Patent (Patent # 5,589,466 issued December 31, 1996) - Justia Patents Search

US Patent for Delivery of exogenous DNA sequences in a mammal Patent (Patent # 5,580,859 issued December 3, 1996) - Justia Patents Search

US Patent for Cationic transport reagents Patent (Patent # 5,527,928 issued June 18, 1996) - Justia Patents Search
 
Last edited:
#25
#25
VolinWayne said:
Here are a few of his patents that have to do with MRNA technologies

US Patent Application for Compounds and methods for enhancing delivery of free polynucleotide Patent Application (Application #20040009947 issued January 15, 2004) - Justia Patents Search

US Patent for DNA vaccines for eliciting a mucosal immune response Patent (Patent # 6,110,898 issued August 29, 2000) - Justia Patents Search

US Patent for Formulations and methods for generating active cytofectin: polynucleotide transfection complexes Patent (Patent # 5,925,623 issued July 20, 1999) - Justia Patents Search

US Patent for Cationic transport reagents Patent (Patent # 5,892,071 issued April 6, 1999) - Justia Patents Search
Click to expand...
Yes, the tag alongs.
He’s still not the inventor. And working on a team that helped figure out the process of making it work doesn’t mean he can make that false claim.

Again, all he had to do was tell the truth and his credibility would not be trashed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top