Overview of Recruiting

#26
#26
every time you guys talk about this it sounds like a foreign language.:huh:
 
#27
#27
So you think we are only going to sign 27 players? If we only sign 27 players, we will get in 23 or 24. I don't see that happening, we need to take as many as we can...

Yes. We will sign at max 27. I see us only signing 26 players. That's why you are starting to see defections happen. I just don't see them taking many if any academic casualties. They will let those guys go and worry about who they can get in school NOW and let the other guys roam free, IMO. They will still recruit those guys, but not as hard. Look at last year's class. Everyone in school but 1. That's the trend will we see in the future.
 
#28
#28
Dude, we already have 20 commitments. We have to get 3 or 4 more OL, a RB, a DL, a QB, a WR, a DB or 2, 2 LBs, and maybe a TE. I don't see us signing below our limit of 30. If we do it will be close...

We have around 16 solid commitments. The soft's will probably not stick, IMO.
 
#30
#30
Dude, dude, dude........dude. must all recruiting threads devolve into the completely impossible to understand recruiting number limit rules question and answer forum????? must they??
 
#31
#31
Yes. We will sign at max 27. I see us only signing 26 players. That's why you are starting to see defections happen. I just don't see them taking many if any academic casualties. They will let those guys go and worry about who they can get in school NOW and let the other guys roam free, IMO. They will still recruit those guys, but not as hard. Look at last year's class. Everyone in school but 1. That's the trend will we see in the future.

Ok, I see what you are saying now. You think we let the 4 or 5 academic underachievers go? I could see that and only signing 26...

I kept getting confused cuz we already have so many commitments and you keep saying we only sign 26...

Gotcha now I think...
 
#32
#32
Ok, I see what you are saying now. You think we let the 4 or 5 academic underachievers go? I could see that and only signing 26...

I kept getting confused cuz we already have so many commitments and you keep saying we only sign 26...

Gotcha now I think...

I got through to you. Now, on to Sab. :)
 
#34
#34
I agree. I get what you are saying now. I think we have been agreeing this whole time...

Yeah, but you guys were focusing on the number too much and people actually thought we could get 30 into school, Which is something I knew wasn't true, but other's didn't understand.
 
#35
#35
Yeah, but you guys were focusing on the number too much and people actually thought we could get 30 into school, Which is something I knew wasn't true, but other's didn't understand.

Gotcha. Next time, when the board starts arguing over this again, make it clear that you think we will have 4 or 5 decommitments before you say we will only sign 26...:good!:
 
#37
#37
I see your lips move but all I see is !@#$DFZD*RWERRQ$%$$ back drafted. But I may be drunk or old. Wait I am both, thats it. Nvr mind
 
#38
#38
Who will probably decommit?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

my guess is delvin jones, broussard, ralph williams, possibly. some say ted meline but i dont think so.

jc copeland? not much info. we will see if number of dl commits becomes a problem(miller,willis,copeland,harris,brown,...)
 
#43
#43
I believe we can sign two midtermers and backcount them, then by rule we can accept 28 LOIs of which only 25 can enter next August on scholarship, provided we have space with the 85 rule. Now we have 80 scholarshiped players with 17 seniors and EB probably being gone.
 

VN Store



Back
Top