He's done well with a 1 dimensional team, you need to expect some hiccup games in the regular season.
Starks fresh legs have been a massive help, but we still need to look for some wheels in the draft at RB
disagree, we need a tailback with a better skill set that what we field now. I can't see not taking someone in the first 3 rounds. I like the idea of John Clay, but i'm not sure about his recieving.It wont matter...Rodgers and that receiving corps do not need a legit run game. Just someone to hang onto it and gain 3 yards every now and then.
I don't care how wide open your offense is you have to be able to run the ball when need be.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
James Starks is that guy. You don't have to have a dominant run game in the NFL, its not college football. Packs offense makes Starks a lot better than he is.
I dont disagree that the Pack take a back in the draft, but 50/50 balance in the NFL is overrated.
The scary thing is that I think you are wrong. Since the they gave up the kickoff return, Green Bay has played a near perfect game.