Warlick should have called a TO at the four-minute mark and sat a couple of players and chewed some butt--regroup. Instead, she let our panicky players continue to play panicky basketball and we fell farther behind. When your team is rattled, you have to stop play and regroup. Huge mistake by her.
I have the highest respect for PS, but Geno was a better coach for the most part, IMO. If you gave each of them the same players (in theory, of course), I'm pretty sure Geno would win, mostly because his team's typically (not always) have a better half-court offense than UT did under PS, and they absolutely passed the ball better. PS's teams were always strangely mediocre at moving the ball. PS was a fanatic about defense and rebounding, but when the game advanced she got left behind offensively. (That was why we won so many ugly games, blue-chip recruits stumbling around against teams we should have beaten by 25. Any one recall that game against Rutgers for the title? We won it, but whew...very ugly.) We won our share of games against Ct., especially during the Parker years when geno's talent level was a bit down, but if you have each of them equal talent I think geno would prevail. The game that did it for me was the year when Taurasi was a senior and we played them in the title game, as I recall. We had an experienced team, Ct. had the Taurasi and four young players--and they beat us. I think the leadership point is true: You gotta have some tough-minded leaders on the court. In that respect Taurasi was a beast. We haven't had anybody remotely like her in a long time. Williams was our leader, to a degree, but she was a spot player until this year. Spani wasn't quite it. Earlier, Stricklin should have been a leader but wasn't--she seemed to have little passion for the game. (Massengale seems too much the same, alas.)
Our problems in recent years were twofold: PS lost her edge and our recruiting fell off noticeably. Really, had PS not landed Parker we would be looking at a LONG stretch without a title. After the great '98 team, our best ever, we had a 9-year drought before Parker came and saved us. After she left, we fell off again. We've been getting highly-rated prospects, but in too many cases the wrong ones--we were a very big slow team for a few years, and our guard play really got pedestrian. Hell, we didn't even have a point guard for two years! Astounding. And there were some injuries, which every team has. Baugh seemed destined to be an excellent player and lost most of her career to bad knees.
I really liked this team because, unlike so many previous UT squads, this team was good offensively and could shoot--except when we got to a big game. But we were pretty bad defensively. Notre Dame embarrassed us this year--must have scored 20 baskets on layups. I thought after Oklahoma game that we had a decent chance to win the championship. The team probably played its best basketball of the year in the first half of that game, and then baylor got beat. We had two very beatable teams in Louisville and Cal before a title matchup with either ND or Ct--and while we would have been the underdog, you never know. Ct. is deep and talented but also young, and their big girl is banged up. ND is good--very smart team--but not exactly teeming with amazing talent. We had a chance--and just to get back to the Final Four would have been a major boost. And then we came out and played scared. Uggh. We should be good next year, but I think geno gets back nearly everybody next year. Warlick has really got to crank up the guard recruiting: there is no reason why we shouldn't have a minimum of three GOOD, athletic guards on this team every year. You have to have three at a MINIMUM. We lost Carter this year and we were left with two guards--one good and one who is skilled but poor defensively and an underachiever, so far, offensively. Heck, we should be playing uptempo with four guards a game.