Volprofch05
Educating and celebrating the Vols
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2021
- Messages
- 16,298
- Likes
- 59,500
Yeah, it's a weird angle, but hiring a just-good-enough-to-not-fire coach could be a long, slow, miserable death.I have serious doubts. Schiano would have been good enough to rack up 6-8 wins a season (maybe an occasional 9 win season) and we would be stuck with him for a decade.
I don’t know. With the resources here as opposed to what he has at Rutgers?? I am not so sure. Also, we wouldn’t have been forever labeled as cheaters. How do we know he wouldn’t have won big here?I have serious doubts. Schiano would have been good enough to rack up 6-8 wins a season (maybe an occasional 9 win season) and we would be stuck with him for a decade.
I think most of the college football world has moved on from (or even forgotten all about) the three year Pruitt reign. All you need to know about Schiano is that OSU didn't even consider him as the replacement for Urban. They went with someone who had never been a head coach. If he wasn't good enough for OSU, it's insane to think he would work out in the much more difficult SEC.I don’t know. With the resources here as opposed to what he has at Rutgers?? I am not so sure. Also, we wouldn’t have been forever labeled as cheaters. How do we know he wouldn’t have won big here?
Acting like the same talking heads wouldn’t have rehashed it and opposing coaches wouldn’t have utilized it for negative recruiting is harsh DELUSION.Unfortunately he's right. I was never a fan of how we used that angle.
We didn't want him because he was another Butch-level coach and we'd had enough of it. If he was a coach with a .800 win percentage and 2 natty's we all would have been yelling "He had nothing to do with the Sandusky case!"
It's the harsh truth, but all's well that ends well.
In the long run, Schiano would have been worse, because he would have been harder to get rid of. He probably would have been consistently 7-5 .... and won just enough to keep his job. Old school hard a$$es are not good fits for Tennessee. He would not have recruited well here at all. It was a terrible fit.I have serious doubts. Schiano would have been good enough to rack up 6-8 wins a season (maybe an occasional 9 win season) and we would be stuck with him for a decade.
There ya go, @butchna … the best he could come up with was special pleading.
Same ole lazy-ass reportingIn the long run, Schiano would have been worse, because he would have been harder to get rid of. He probably would have been consistently 7-5 .... and won just enough to keep his job. Old school hard a$$es are not good fits for Tennessee. He would not have recruited well here at all. It was a terrible fit.
As for Forde, not all Tennessee fans upset with the hire of Schiano were invoking the Sandusky scandal. Forde is mostly just referring to some social media posts, but that in no way speaks for an entire fan base as large as Tennessee's.
Yes .... Lazy, unprofessional and hypocritical is how I would describe Pat Forde.Same ole lazy-ass reporting
No.I have serious doubts. Schiano would have been good enough to rack up 6-8 wins a season (maybe an occasional 9 win season) and we would be stuck with him for a decade.