madgeyoung
Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
- Messages
- 17
- Likes
- 98
He has mentioned at least twice on his show today that Holly's days are numbered at Tennessee.
I really think that the AD and Administration's backs are against the wall, especially since we are talking about the legacy of a storied program that set the standards for women's college basketball. Their actions, or lack thereof, will not only be judged by loyal Lady Vol fans, but those outside of Knoxville that support Women's College basketball. There are no viable excuses for lack of action. Holly has to go or at least her staff. At this time it would be best to clean house.
We can blame sexual harassement complaints or the Hindenburg mishap, but in the end, good or bad, results fall in the lap of the head coach. Sucvcess in the rear view mirror do not outplay the total collapse of a program. Look at all the negative firsts that have happen to this program in just this year alone. Allowing Holly and her staff to stay, as is, based upon present negativity, is a self imposed death penalty for the Lady Vols. That is a low down dirty shame for all of Women's basketball.
Why should a coach HAVE to motivate their players. The players are here to play for the university and get an education. That is their job. Holly doesn't throw the ball away, shoot sh_tty shots, or make bad passes. That's on the players. They should be up for the NEXT game, regardless of who it is. Holly can plan for a game till the cows come home, but ultimately, it is on the players to execute..they are the ones with all the skills.:thumbsup:I heard Paul's interview of Andy Landers and he tried to blame this bad season on the fact that LV players are playing as if they are disinterested. Andy who is responsible for motivating the players? Duh, answer is the head coach. Does he think that all the LV players all got together, during preseason, and created a conspiracy to jeopardize the Lady Vols' season? This is plain ludicrous. If the animals are running the zoo, the head zoo keeper needs to be released from their duty.
Why should a coach HAVE to motivate their players. The players are here to play for the university and get an education. That is their job. Holly doesn't throw the ball away, shoot sh_tty shots, or make bad passes. That's on the players. They should be up for the NEXT game, regardless of who it is. Holly can plan for a game till the cows come home, but ultimately, it is on the players to execute..they are the ones with all the skills.:thumbsup:
Why should a coach HAVE to motivate their players. The players are here to play for the university and get an education. That is their job. Holly doesn't throw the ball away, shoot sh_tty shots, or make bad passes. That's on the players. They should be up for the NEXT game, regardless of who it is. Holly can plan for a game till the cows come home, but ultimately, it is on the players to execute..they are the ones with all the skills.:thumbsup:
I've only seen one game on TV out here this year. Can't remember who it was or who won, but I remember thinking they just don't look as sharp as the used to. No leader on the floor and looked like they were just going thru the motions. Holly can RAH, RAH, RAH in the huddle, but they need someone on the floor to call them out when they don't hustle.
Why should a coach HAVE to motivate their players. The players are here to play for the university and get an education. That is their job. Holly doesn't throw the ball away, shoot sh_tty shots, or make bad passes. That's on the players. They should be up for the NEXT game, regardless of who it is. Holly can plan for a game till the cows come home, but ultimately, it is on the players to execute..they are the ones with all the skills.:thumbsup:
Why should a coach HAVE to motivate their players. The players are here to play for the university and get an education. That is their job. Holly doesn't throw the ball away, shoot sh_tty shots, or make bad passes. That's on the players. They should be up for the NEXT game, regardless of who it is. Holly can plan for a game till the cows come home, but ultimately, it is on the players to execute..they are the ones with all the skills.:thumbsup:
I wouldn't get too excited, Finebaum doesn't know crap about women's bball....
These players don't get paid to play, it's not their JOB! They are in the schools athletic program to become better players and to learn. I tell you who does have a job to do and that's Holly! Her job is to teach these young women and motivate them so they can be better for the next level. They are coming into the college program as raw talent and you better believe a main job of a coach is to motivate and Warlick has not been doing hers, at all! Pro players, men and women, need motivation sometimes from their coaches. What a ridiculous thing to say and what a horrible way to try to blame everything on these young players who look lost on the court because they have no "real" coach.
You are correct "mule" they are subsidized for playing at this institution. But, the point is many schools would like to pay these athletes to play at their schools, would anyone pay Holly to coach at their institution...:birgits_giggle:!actually they are paid,free housing,food,health care and a well earned education,I'm sure I am missing other things,but that is a lot of cash going there way
so you may as well consider them paid
I wouldn't get too excited, Finebaum doesn't know crap about women's bball....