hohenfelsvol
How uwe doo-in?!?
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2005
- Messages
- 50,392
- Likes
- 2,738
Originally posted by VolunteerHillbilly@Dec 16, 2005 2:44 PM
Look. The reason that the top four BCS bowls are in that tier is because they were the bowls making the highest payouts to participating schools at the time the BCS was established. The article says that Chick-fil-A is giving something like $30 million for the name. That money will result in a higher payout to the schools. If the Chick-fil-A bowl is paying more than the Fiesta or Orange next time the contract is negotiated it might get bumped up. I can't see the Rose Bowl ever getting bumped down just on the basis of tradition. Who knows what will happen to the Sugar Bowl (which is another area of opportunity for the C-f-A Bowl)? Do you really believe that Chick-fil-A needs the pub from taking the Peach out of the title? I imagine that some Atlanta booster like Spurgeon Richardson went to the Chick-fil-A people and asked them to do this. The Chick-fil-A people have to justify the expenditure somehow so they say they are buying the title.
[snapback]216185[/snapback]
Originally posted by IBleedOrange@Dec 16, 2005 3:31 PM
well thats definetly true, more power to them if they can get a BCS bowl in atlanta, i really hope that get to that level since i live so close to atl i would go watch it as much as i could no matter who was playing in it
[snapback]216314[/snapback]
Originally posted by VolunteerHillbilly@Dec 16, 2005 9:45 AM
They actually grow more peaches in South Carolina than in Georgia. Also, the artcle said it has been the Peach Bowl since 1968. That's not exactly a long history.
[snapback]215981[/snapback]
Originally posted by allvol@Dec 16, 2005 10:15 PM
[sarcasm] "...but we can't have a playoff because we want to preserve the tradition of the bowls..." :banghead: :banghead:
[snapback]216604[/snapback]