hohenfelsvol
How uwe doo-in?!?
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2005
- Messages
- 50,392
- Likes
- 2,738
Based on what?
Was there a bigger name FL was after in 04? Other than Stoops who was mentioned for every job every year and not budging.
Meyer and Utah were getting A LOT of media love in 2004. Alex Smith was a Heisman finalist and they were a BCS buster. He was THE biggest name that was realistically on the market.
I would argue that Saban wasn't even a "homerun" quality candidate before taking the Bama job. Despite his success at LSU he never put back to back 10+ win seasons together at that point in his career. He wasn't even their 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th choice. They were striking out with a the big names before reaching out to him.
First, I would like to say that there are not many homerun hires and none of them could be called "locks". I know people will say if we got Gruden it would be a "home run hire"(puke), but we were just pawns for Gruden to line his pocket book.
Second, this phrase is really dumb and if you use it you look dumb in the process. Unless you are Nostradamus you cant tell if someone is going to a "homerun hire" (puke), because hiring a coach is just like football sometimes it comes down to how the ball bounces.
Lastly, the job at the Univeristy of Tennessee is not a prestigous as some of you would believe. Its a good job in a great conference. We have facilities ( so does all the top contenders) we have tradition ( so does 3/4 of the SEC) and we have rapid fanbase that refuses to quit using the term "homerun hire" and understand we are not hiring Bill Belicheck(sp?), Vince lombardi, Tom Landry, or The Bear.
Most of the remaining coaches on the list, which is basically down to Strong or Strong imho is going to be such a vast improvement of what we had that you will be behind him before the season starts.
So quit setting yourself up for disappointment and get on the bandwagon. It may be the bandwagon to 9-3 but it may not and you cant say either way.
I would say Meyer was home run. He was the most attractive name on the market the year he took the FL job. Many questioned if his system would work in the SEC but he quickly proved himself am elite recruiter. Then he had the good fortune of the perfect QB for his system fall in his lap.
I would beg to differ on Saban. He not only had HC experience in the SEC with success But he also had coaching experience at Mich State and several stints in the NFL coaching with Miami, oilers and a couple if other NFL teams as well as big Colleges. So, by comparison, he is certainly more qualified than any of the candidates that we are " settling for". This is just based on the candidates that I have herd on here and it is possible that we are looking at other options that we are not aware of. However, Strong with a 61% winning average in the Big East is certainly nothing to be excited about. It is settling for a last option. I hope it isn't for jkack of trying. Yes, he is better than what we had. But a pimple is better than staff infection. But neither is goodWas there a bigger name FL was after in 04? Other than Stoops who was mentioned for every job every year and not budging.
Meyer and Utah were getting A LOT of media love in 2004. Alex Smith was a Heisman finalist and they were a BCS buster. He was THE biggest name that was realistically on the market.
I would argue that Saban wasn't even a "homerun" quality candidate before taking the Bama job. Despite his success at LSU he never put back to back 10+ win seasons together at that point in his career. He wasn't even their 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th choice. They were striking out with a the big names before reaching out to him.
OP, my use of the term "home run" is a general term to describe a hire that has the best chance (notice I said chance) of doing all of the following three things.. 1. Unite the fanbase/create a "buzz".. 2. Trigger a bump in recruiting and ultimately recruit well.. 3. Win...
Your use of the word "dumb" in describing people who use the phrase further illustrates the old saying "opinions are like a$$holes, everybody has one" and quite often you find a person that is one..
Home run is a dumb term for hiring. It is something the media has concocted. Just as it is with first or second round draft picks to measure talent. Coaches and orgs never do that. They compare the player to what they have and have their own grading scales.
OP, my use of the term "home run" is a general term to describe a hire that has the best chance (notice I said chance) of doing all of the following three things.. 1. Unite the fanbase/create a "buzz".. 2. Trigger a bump in recruiting and ultimately recruit well.. 3. Win...
Your use of the word "dumb" in describing people who use the phrase further illustrates the old saying "opinions are like a$$holes, everybody has one" and quite often you find a person that is one..
I would beg to differ on Saban. He not only had HC experience in the SEC with success But he also had coaching experience at Mich State and several stints in the NFL coaching with Miami, oilers and a couple if other NFL teams as well as big Colleges. So, by comparison, he is certainly more qualified than any of the candidates that we are " settling for". This is just based on the candidates that I have herd on here and it is possible that we are looking at other options that we are not aware of. However, Strong with a 61% winning average in the Big East is certainly nothing to be excited about. It is settling for a last option. I hope it isn't for jkack of trying. Yes, he is better than what we had. But a pimple is better than staff infection. But neither is good
With us interviewing Strong and Gundy off campus, you would think no matter who was hired, they would take a tour of campus, facilities, and surrounding things before taking the job. Is it common to hire a coach without him ever stepping foot on campus?