Peterman vs Worley vs Ferguson for 2013!

Starter for 2013

  • Total voters
    0
#27
#27
Boogieman said:
I will take a wait and see approach as to who I want to start, but had to vote for Worley, He will be a Junior and seems like people forgot he was Gatorade player of the year, (Was he not?)
Click to expand...

I'm not really sure how many people have forgotten about it. Pretty sure a lot of the peterson votes (mine included) were done just to piss off one particular poster in the other thread of the same subject.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#30
#30
We haven't seen Peterman take a snap for the Vols yet. We have seen Worley, but mostly in some type.of extreme.pressure like when Dooley cost his red shirt just to throw him to the wolves. It would be hard for any young qb to perform under some of the situations he has faced.

I dont think bUTch gives a rip one way or the other what this 'poll' says when he picks the starting qb.
 
#32
#32
Rudy123 said:
Often times, the 2nd string q.b. is the most popular player on the team.

Remember when Stephens was playing poorly and fans wanted to see B.J. Coleman play? I remember him starting the Vandy game. We had maybe four pass plays the entire game. We ran the ball all the time and we won the game because Eric Berry forced an interception and gave us the game. So, At that time, B.J. didn't have the coaches confidence enough to even pass the ball. So, B.J. was not an improvement over Stephens.


None of us has seen Peterman play yet, so the jury is still out on him. However; I have seen Worley play. He played well against M.T.S.U. but the Vandy game this season and the Arkansas game from last season were not good for him at all......
Click to expand...

Coleman had some good throws that game.....would've been a good QB if he didnt leave for UTC for whatever reason
 
Last edited:
#33
#33
Whoever coach thinks is best. That said, there's probably a reason he was recruiting Peterman to Cincinnati.
 
#35
#35
After the O/W game there will be some sort of order of who is 1 and 2. Nothing will be settled until the fall after CBJ gets to see all three do their thing.
 
#36
#36
Disappoint. I was expecting the OP to tell us about Aaron Rodgers, I mean Peterman.
 
#37
#37
BaldBiker said:
I'm not really sure how many people have forgotten about it. Pretty sure a lot of the peterson votes (mine included) were done just to piss off one particular poster in the other thread of the same subject.
Click to expand...

ahhh, ok I see... I missed that one. :eek:k:
 
#38
#38
Boogieman said:
ahhh, ok I see... I missed that one. :eek:k:
Click to expand...

Personally. I don't care who the starter is right now. Which ever one or combination gets us the most wins.

With the poor game time coaching we've had over the last couple of years, I personally am considering this to be my own personal year *zero* as far as evaluating and deciding how I feel about the players on our roster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#39
#39
BaldBiker said:
Personally. I don't care who the starter is right now. Which ever one or combination gets us the most wins.

With the poor game time coaching we've had over the last couple of years, I personally am considering this to be my own personal year *zero* as far as evaluating and deciding how I feel about the players on our roster.
Click to expand...

Amazing, isn't it? I've been on this team for eleventeen hundred years and I have no idea what we have. (now that Patterson is gone)
 
#42
#42
voldawgforever said:
Amazing, isn't it? I've been on this team for eleventeen hundred years and I have no idea what we have. (now that Patterson is gone)
Click to expand...

It really is. That is why i'm choosing to be optimistic. As far as I know at this point, we may be fielding a NC team. Even the guys that did not play up to my expectations last year have an excuse in my eyes.

I do know we have a good O-Line, so that is something. I don't hold with the arguement that they weren't very good at run blocking, because I really don't think they were given the same amount of game time experience to mature at it as they were pass blocking. I mean when you pass on all of your 3rd and short plays, that takes away a lot of oppurtunity for your line to get better at run blocking.
 
#44
#44
BaldBiker said:
Personally. I don't care who the starter is right now. Which ever one or combination gets us the most wins.

With the poor game time coaching we've had over the last couple of years, I personally am considering this to be my own personal year *zero* as far as evaluating and deciding how I feel about the players on our roster.
Click to expand...

I feel the same.
 
#45
#45
BaldBiker said:
It really is. That is why i'm choosing to be optimistic. As far as I know at this point, we may be fielding a NC team. Even the guys that did not play up to my expectations last year have an excuse in my eyes.

I do know we have a good O-Line, so that is something. I don't hold with the arguement that they weren't very good at run blocking, because I really don't think they were given the same amount of game time experience to mature at it as they were pass blocking. I mean when you pass on all of your 3rd and short plays, that takes away a lot of oppurtunity for your line to get better at run blocking.
Click to expand...

I thought our O-Line did a good job at run blocking as well as pass blocking.
 
#47
#47
Boogieman said:
I thought our O-Line did a good job at run blocking as well as pass blocking.
Click to expand...


A lot on here don't agree with you. I do, but a lot don't.

We excelled in pass blocking. Don't think anyone (or at least few) argue that. Run blocking tends to be where most differences of opinion come into play. My opinion is that we did well. The only reason that the O-line didn't mayure as quickly with run blocking as pass blocking was because of the in game situations they were put in due to bad passes, dropped balls and bad in game coaching. Playing from behind tends to take the running game out of the picture. Throwing on 3rd and 1 definitely does.
 
#48
#48
BaldBiker said:
A lot on here don't agree with you. I do, but a lot don't.

We excelled in pass blocking. Don't think anyone (or at least few) argue that. Run blocking tends to be where most differences of opinion come into play. My opinion is that we did well. The only preason that the O-line didn't mayure as quickly with run blocking as pass blocking was because of the in game situations they were put in due to bad passes, dropped balls and bad in game coaching. Playing from behind tends to take the running game out of the picture. Throwing on 3rd and 1 definitely does.
Click to expand...

Chaney was an idiot and I'm glad he's gone.
No more deep passes on 3rd and short!
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top