Thunder Good-Oil
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 47,179
- Likes
- 49,034
Mashack has made big improvements in ball handling, so he helped some last night. Having said that, I would press the hell out of this team going forward and I don't understand why arkansas didn't adjust their gameplan
I say it now, calmly, but I'm not going to press the alarm if we struggle on Saturday at PG (I reserve the right to go off the deep end), simply because it will be in a very tough environment and will be the first game without ZZ as starter & our opponent has an opportunity to scheme us.
What will concern me on Saturday, besides not being able to break the press, will be if they pick us up at half court and we just absolutely can't get the ball in the paint or get into our motion on offense - that might be more indicative of our lack of skill at PG.
ZZ at 5'9" and is replaced with 6'4" Mashack when Santi slides to PG..... On defense, we are definitely in a "different" type of defense.
The length with Santi at PG and Mashack on the floor will make our defense tougher to face.
Man, if Mashack had a legit finish in the style of Julian Phillips, he'd be the most dangerous man on the court. IMO, he gets to the lane and can get to the basket quicker than anyone we have on the roster.
So if I understand what most are saying, what we give up in ZZ ball handling, assists, and leadership is somewhat made up for in height and defensive ability.
We need to beat Auburn for the NCAA seed not just the SEC seed.Barn REALLY needs a win. Especially if Bama runs them tonight. If Bama, KY, and LSU (an unlikely outcome versus Missouri) all win tonight then Saturday’s game for TN will be a nothing to lose game. It becomes mostly an opportunity to work on some things minus ZZ.
James should become PG like Danny Manning did.Musselman's Opening Statement after last night's game:
"They're so long, so physicality ... on both sides of the ball. The screen-setting. And then when Zeigler got hurt, they became bigger, taller, more physical probably. They completely out-physicaled us, there's no doubt about it. The loose ball game. The rebounding game. The screen-setting was much more forceful than ours. Yeah, I would say it's the best defensive team that we've played."
We're all devastated for ZZ - kid is all heart and a straight dog - but I wonder what our new dynamic will be going forward? Vescovi at PG? Key (if healthy)? PG by committee? Is there any upside to what Musselman alluded to in his statement (Bold font)?
My concern is that we didn't handle a true full-court press well with ZZ, now it may be an even bigger issue - I don't feel confident with anyone else being able to break the press with their dribble.
Big time reach - stay with me - but maybe this becomes the rally point we look back at and say "that's when we became a different team and won the natty." A rally similar to 1998 when Peyton just graduated and Jamal tore his ACL; of course, didn't hurt that Travis Stephens and Travis Henry were his backups, but you get the picture!
We need to beat Auburn for the NCAA seed not just the SEC seed.
We are not "giving up" ZZ's production.... This team is as deep as any team Barnes has had at Tennessee... If you think this team will have a leadership void without ZZ on the court, I don't know what to tell you... This team is a experienced and mature as we've had and JJJ is back on the court. I have zero doubt that others will step up and play for ZZ in his absence. This isn't some slight at ZZ.
For weeks we have not been a full health team, usually having 2 guys out..... Just as JJJ/Phillips shots per game have rotated to others who are playing, ZZ and (and now) Key's shots are going to rotate to JJJ/Phillips/Mashack/Key(when he returns) as Santi becomes PG.
We lost ZZ while JJJ/Phillips came back in the rotation... Key will be coming back soon too.... If you thing we are in a situation where we don't have the man power to replace 11 points and 5 assists a game between 3-4 guys, I don't think you've watched this team.
Our offense will definitely be more methodical and slower with us losing ZZ's elusiveness. But am I worried about not being able to replace his production on offense? Of course not. In regards to defense, our defense changes to a bigger and longer defense that is likely going to be just as good as we've been or potentially better... I trust the experience and depth of this team. It sucks losing ZZ, but next man up... We are now a different type of defense without him on the court... That isn't some swipe on him either... Replacing someone that is 5'9" with a 6'4" guy on the court means our defense is bigger which should equate to more disruption and rebounding... Is that saying ZZ doesn't make our defense tougher? No. The team will just be different without ZZ on the court.
I think Jahmai is now probably our second best option. He actually had 5 assists yesterday, which was tied for the team lead. He's got one skill which no one else on our team possesses, and that's the ability to break down his man off the dribble, which causes rotations to happen. Santi can do that off a pump fake, but not straight up. ZZ could a little bit for sure, but was better using a ball screen giving how slippery he was.Vescovi has the experience but I would rather have him roaming the perimeter as he is by far the best 3 point threat on the team.
Not sure they really have another good option at PG though.
There aren’t many pressing teams as in decades past. Sone do it in spots like we do, but to do it all the time is different. I think we will be fine!Mashack has made big improvements in ball handling, so he helped some last night. Having said that, I would press the hell out of this team going forward and I don't understand why arkansas didn't adjust their gameplan
Dang it, is this my wife’s burner account? Bringing up some old sh*t? I’ll own it, I said immediately after Vandy it was a possibility this team would lose out, save S. Carolina... To be fair, our remaining games were mostly against all Q1 teams when I said it.haha. This isn't new.
Haven't you already called the season over a half dozen times this year?
I could be mistaken, but didn't you predict 0-7 to end the reg season?
Auburn loves to press, we're going to find out real quick what life without a speedy little point guard is like. They need Key back now.. He may be hot and cold as a shooter but he's pretty good at getting the ball up the court.
Dang it, is this my wife’s burner account? Bringing up some old sh*t? I’ll own it, I said immediately after Vandy it was a possibility this team would lose out, save S. Carolina... To be fair, our remaining games were mostly against all Q1 teams when I said it.
My biggest concern will be late game FTs. ZZ was our best late game shooter. Now, I’d look for I guess James first if he’s playing. If he’s not I’d probably go for Key over Santi but they’re about the same percentage-wise.The one good thing we have going is size at PG with Santi now. He isn't as quick as Mashack so a 6'4" Mashack guarding Wendell Green Jr could be interesting matchup.
At end of the day, this team is mature and deep. They just have to go out and play. Losing ZZ will test their experience and maturity. Also big test for Barnes to make adjustments now that ZZ has forced him to go bigger / longer lineup.
My biggest concern will be late game FTs. ZZ was our best late game shooter. Now, I’d look for I guess James first if he’s playing. If he’s not I’d probably go for Key over Santi but they’re about the same percentage-wise.
And that’s exactly the mindset I hope we have. We do still have to score too but surely getting JJJ and JP back will help there. In the tourney you will definitely have a close game or two if you’re advancing. Teams will use high pressure and hope for FT misses if within about 12 around 1:00. It’s rare but I’ve seen double digits comebacks in the last minute. A&M did it in the dance a few years ago. If we have that problem it’ll be a good one to have as that means we’ve done well to get to that point but I know I’ll be nervous about it if we get there. I agree with you, Auburn will be interesting as we know Pearl will press and trap us a lot.Well if our new longer defense causes more disruption, we shouldn’t have to worry about being in a free throw shooting contest.
Dang it, is this my wife’s burner account? Bringing up some old sh*t? I’ll own it, I said immediately after Vandy it was a possibility this team would lose out, save S. Carolina... To be fair, our remaining games were mostly against all Q1 teams when I said it.
I’m not sure, but maybe. ZZ did a great job staying between his man and the basket. We will see if Mashack can as well.ZZ at 5'9" and is replaced with 6'4" Mashack when Santi slides to PG..... On defense, we are definitely in a "different" type of defense.
The length with Santi at PG and Mashack on the floor will make our defense tougher to face.