BowlBrother85
1 star recruit
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 44,219
- Likes
- 38,562
Do you see the attraction toward children in a sexual sense in Gunn's tweets? If Yes, you got yourself a pedophile by definition. If No, check with your spiritual optometrist, you most positively have morality glaucoma.
Your reading comprehension is lacking. My comment about southern states was made to point out that southern economies are heavily dependent upon the federal government money they receive. California is the single largest contributor to that funding. Therefore, southern economies would be hard hit by California withholding that money. You try to turn it into some condemnation of individuals from the south.
Then I questioned whether Gunn's tweets were designed to be offensive rather than indicating Gunn's preference for pedophilia and you twist that into support for a pedophile? I don't particularly care that he got fired, but I don't think his offensive tweets make him a pedophile. My point was that the outrage is selective even within the limited scope of offensive jokes about pedophilia. For the second time today, you have taken what I said and then purposely twisted its meaning. Quit. You're better than that.
Every member of NAMBLA that is pushing for social and legal acceptance?If you take them seriously, yes. How many pedophiles advertise their sickness on a public platform? It was offensive. It was gross. It doesn't mean he's a pedophile.
Your communication skills may be the problem, as you claimed that if California seceded, the South would "waller" (wallow) in poverty forever. That is, it would be impossible for those dumb damn southerners to fend for themselves without liberal Cali feeding them. If that's not what you intended to write, whatever. I would think a lawyer would know how to communicate, though I can imagine a lawyer wrongly shifting the blame. So... You git that going for you.
Your opening volly was to ask whether all 100 comedians in some show/movie/??? should be blackballed, and then clearly inferred in the rest of the conversation that, no, they shouldn't, and thus neither should Gunn. You doubled down by saying the difference with Barr was immediacy. Again... Learn to communicate, counselor, if you don't want to be held accountable to what you write.
Now... I will defend Gunn's right to tweet whatever he likes. I will also not shed a tear for him when he rightly gets a cultural backlash for such sick and twisted shat. And yes... I highly suspect that that dark humor came form a very dark drive. If he can't live with being suspected a pedophile, he really shouldn't act like one.
Every member of NAMBLA that is pushing for social and legal acceptance?
Again... If he doesn't want to be a suspected pedo, he shouldn't act like one.
There’s a big push in the LGMTQOPMGTCHH community to accept pedophilia. Pretty sure that’s not a troll job.Okay. Was that put up by the equivalent of an internet troll?
I hear all about the dangers that we are gradually accepting pedophilia, but I don't see anyone besides very few wackadoos who are arguing for it. Typically, it is brought the extreme religious right when attempting to justify their bigoted views on homosexuality.
Look Mr. Echo, you can do the google or twitter search on your own. I don’t GAF what you call bullsh!t on.LOL! You made a claim that the LGBT community was pushing to accept pedophilia and I called bull $hit. That is all... if you have proof, then provide it. I would bet that you have Infowars and that's it.