DinkinFlicka
Erect Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 29,549
- Likes
- 24,539
He claims to beIs Trump a Christian at all?
That guy is all over the place, man. Hottest takes on a plethora of subjects. And by hottest, I mean nonsensical.
Do you know the difference between following Christianity and being principled or having a set of values that you follow? Does it mean that the person always follow them? No, but they tend to follow them.
I hate to break the news to you but being a nice guy won't get you to heaven for the believers and the non-believers. Even the believers better tighten up on the adherence to the word of God.
Maybe the best Christian since Jeffrey Dahmer@ClearwaterVol and I were discussing this in another thread. What say you?
Lol.
I'm gonna believe that you believe what you claim to believe. Take that however you want.
99 percent of Christians are not good Christians and I put myself in that category. Met less than a handful of people in my lifetime who I honestly think truly live like Christ wants. At the end of the day none of us are better than the thief on the cross.
It wasn't meant to be a trick question. I think there are some honorable things about him. There are some things I don't find honorable but I think he is a decent man of certain principles. One judge of a man, is how he rears his kids. I think it's safe to say you can't point to a lot of public controversy there. That is one example of where he gets a good ✔. I don't plan to vote for him in the primary though.
You know his kids?
Deeply flawed people raise great kids as much as great people raise deeply flawed kids.
That's a terrible metric, fyi.
99 percent of Christians are not good Christians and I put myself in that category. Met less than a handful of people in my lifetime who I honestly think truly live like Christ wants. At the end of the day none of us are better than the thief on the cross.
Sure you can. What is wrong with judging Hitler to be a terrible person? There are times when we have incomplete information, so you can't go from "X did morally bad act Z," to "X is a terrible person." But that's about the lack of information and would apply across the board to any judgment. But much of the time we have a surfeit of information on which to judge the moral quality of a person, as well as what is motivating their action (and whether that creates any excuses of justifications for their immoral actions).It’s taken out of context. You can judge the action but not the person or why they did it.