Post Your Voter Fraud Evidence Here

Evidence can literally be on video and they won’t admit it. They know it’s happening but they can’t admit it because without it they can’t win most of the time. The ones that chime in on here and defend the cheating have voluntary cranial rectal inversion.

The states in question are the ones that can’t seem to get their chit together and get their votes counted. It’s a chronic problem.
It’s always the swing states.
 
All elections should be able to be 100% transparent....ballots should be numbered and trackable, for verification. Each ballot in take person should be monitored by 2 other to verify proper handling...it should he the most secure process in the US.

It's a shame, the communist DIMS will go to any length to steal the vote
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Most countries can settle their elections in a day, but here we are in one of the most advanced countries in the world and we have states not even half the population of Florida that settled their election in one day, need weeks to settle their states elections.
The more time it takes sends red flags that you need more time to cheat.
It only sends red flags when the party you support loses. I have a strange feeling of Lauren Boebert ends up winning in Colorado, not many Republicans will scream “election fraud”.

Now I do agree with you that it’s a little ridiculous with the technology we have today for vote counting to last a week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
Apparently there are groups within the Republican Party who are "testing" the system by holding mail in ballots until election day and then delivering them to the election offices by hand. There is no way those could be counted same day.

The idea is the frustration of seeing mail-in ballots being counted after election day and having those come in overwhelmingly Democratic. So they are "testing" it to see if the increase in Republican votes cast by mail are reflected in the totals.

Could be adding to the delays.
 
Apparently there are groups within the Republican Party who are "testing" the system by holding mail in ballots until election day and then delivering them to the election offices by hand. There is no way those could be counted same day.

The idea is the frustration of seeing mail-in ballots being counted after election day and having those come in overwhelmingly Democratic. So they are "testing" it to see if the increase in Republican votes cast by mail are reflected in the totals.

Could be adding to the delays.
It also adds to catching the crooks. The reason this has become a popular tactic is because it's caught a bunch of fraud. People who requested a mail order ballot, often never find out that someone already voted for them, and their later vote is simply not counted.

If however you show up with a sealed unopened ballot and go vote, they will say hey we sent you a ballot and you can then present them with the unopened ballot and vote then. You can be assured your vote hasn't been tampered with. Better yet, if someone did vote under your name, and you show up with a sealed ballot you can contact the police on site and immediately file a report for identity theft, which will likely move faster then crying election fraud. Several areas have busted a ton of election fraud by doing this.

There is zero reason this should cause delay for the polling site. If it's slowing things down it's because their finding a bunch of fraud from it, and in that case it SHOULD slow things down.
 
It only sends red flags when the party you support loses. I have a strange feeling of Lauren Boebert ends up winning in Colorado, not many Republicans will scream “election fraud”.

Now I do agree with you that it’s a little ridiculous with the technology we have today for vote counting to last a week.

Election Fraud is Election Fraud, the party is inconsequential to me. Either party guilty of it deserves the full punishment possible under the law. HOWEVER. to say it is lopsided on which party tends to perpetrate election fraud is an understatement. Back to "bussing" people for votes Democrats have been organizing it in mass for a century. Really over a century, they created the KKK to suppress Republican voters and even beat them when they tried to go vote.
 
It only sends red flags when the party you support loses. I have a strange feeling of Lauren Boebert ends up winning in Colorado, not many Republicans will scream “election fraud”.

Now I do agree with you that it’s a little ridiculous with the technology we have today for vote counting to last a week.
Well that one race will be different, because reasons...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sin City Vol
It also adds to catching the crooks. The reason this has become a popular tactic is because it's caught a bunch of fraud. People who requested a mail order ballot, often never find out that someone already voted for them, and their later vote is simply not counted.

If however you show up with a sealed unopened ballot and go vote, they will say hey we sent you a ballot and you can then present them with the unopened ballot and vote then. You can be assured your vote hasn't been tampered with. Better yet, if someone did vote under your name, and you show up with a sealed ballot you can contact the police on site and immediately file a report for identity theft, which will likely move faster then crying election fraud. Several areas have busted a ton of election fraud by doing this.

There is zero reason this should cause delay for the polling site. If it's slowing things down it's because their finding a bunch of fraud from it, and in that case it SHOULD slow things down.


Here you guys go, claiming massive fraud and yet you can't ever prove it. Not a single case of systemic fraud proven in court in 2 years of searching.

If it's so prevalent, why can't you prove it?
 
Here you guys go, claiming massive fraud and yet you can't ever prove it. Not a single case of systemic fraud proven in court in 2 years of searching.

If it's so prevalent, why can't you prove it?

It has easily been proven. The evidence has been shown. Some choose to ignore it. Links were given but rather then discussing the evidence Ad hominem attacks are returned instead.

Just as last election numbers come in that violate Benford's law. Also that statistical law is only ever violated for one side of the vote.
Joe Biden’s Votes Violate Benford’s Law (Mathematics) – Statistically Impossible

Then corrupt courts refuse to listen to the evidence, refuse to make evidence public. The same people refusing to see the evidence are those that are apart of the same criminals cheating in the first place. Then idiots like yourself repeat the lie..."no evidence was given."

Your assertion is tantamount to saying if the criminals says their innocent and that the evidence against them is false...there was no evidence. However the empirical evidence remains these numbers are statistically impossible. People who are not sheep, and capable of objective reason see that truth, and will continue to see it. You can repeat the law like a trained parrot all you like. These are unnatural and impossible occuring data sets. They PROVE the election is tampered with.

FhGt1STWIAAxlBj.jpg

fe46fb2c585700bd8bd0aa3e978f73be0919ff07b9117c9b757c1f35e6e6785a.png


b4836b20f2e4a9bd0af2a154d00b16bbe0436b457575557535c94bbaed1e502f.png

Lastly the proof is in the cover up. Courts refusing to hear evidence, then keeping evidence from public, tech platforms censoring mathematical arguments, and evidence, the left refusing to tackle the math and making personal attacks instead. All of this also shows they fear analysis of the numbers. The Truth does not fear being dissected and discussed, but lies and liars do.

The evidence over the last two election cycles:
We have undisputed numbers that break Benfords law. We have video evidence of cheating at drop boxes. We have in some case testimony on the voting machines, and proof they were networked. We had ballots with no folds proving they were never mailed. The evidence is staggering, but if you refuse to acknowledge it and the criminals get to decide what is "evidence" it doesn't do much good. However the truth will always be there, and people not brain washed will always see it for what it is.
 
It has easily been proven. The evidence has been shown. Some choose to ignore it. Links were given but rather then discussing the evidence Ad hominem attacks are returned instead.

Just as last election numbers come in that violate Benford's law. Also that statistical law is only ever violated for one side of the vote.
Joe Biden’s Votes Violate Benford’s Law (Mathematics) – Statistically Impossible

Then corrupt courts refuse to listen to the evidence, refuse to make evidence public. The same people refusing to see the evidence are those that are apart of the same criminals cheating in the first place. Then idiots like yourself repeat the lie..."no evidence was given."

Your assertion is tantamount to saying if the criminals says their innocent and that the evidence against them is false...there was no evidence. However the empirical evidence remains these numbers are statistically impossible. People who are not sheep, and capable of objective reason see that truth, and will continue to see it. You can repeat the law like a trained parrot all you like. These are unnatural and impossible occuring data sets. They PROVE the election is tampered with.

View attachment 513391

View attachment 513392


View attachment 513393

Lastly the proof is in the cover up. Courts refusing to hear evidence, then keeping evidence from public, tech platforms censoring mathematical arguments, and evidence, the left refusing to tackle the math and making personal attacks instead. All of this also shows they fear analysis of the numbers. The Truth does not fear being dissected and discussed, but lies and liars do.

The evidence over the last two election cycles:
We have undisputed numbers that break Benfords law. We have video evidence of cheating at drop boxes. We have in some case testimony on the voting machines, and proof they were networked. We had ballots with no folds proving they were never mailed. The evidence is staggering, but if you refuse to acknowledge it and the criminals get to decide what is "evidence" it doesn't do much good. However the truth will always be there, and people not brain washed will always see it for what it is.


Also, the officiating in today's game sucks! Amirite?
 

VN Store



Back
Top