Here is what I can tell you: assuming they "took their foot off the pedal" they did so against some incredibly weak competition. Oregon played one team, 1 TEAM, all year who had better talent than they did. Granted, they beat that team (USC) but also lost to a Stanford team who has talent on par to SCAR.
The counter argument to this is that Bama played no one whom they out-recruited and also lost to one team whom they didn't out recruit. The difference between a team like Bama and Oregon is that Bama is the best recruited team in the NCAA. Oregon conversely has recruiting averages on par with UT. That would make Oregon a mid-tier SEC team, assuming their new coach can get as much out of them as Kelly. Contrary to popular opinion, Oregon does not perform well against teams with similar or better talent. Truth be told, most of the NCAA doesn't (about 2/3 of the games can be predicted by simply looking at talent averages).
Here is what I can tell you: assuming they "took their foot off the pedal" they did so against some incredibly weak competition. Oregon played one team, 1 TEAM, all year who had better talent than they did. Granted, they beat that team (USC) but also lost to a Stanford team who has talent on par to SCAR.
The counter argument to this is that Bama played no one whom they out-recruited and also lost to one team whom they didn't out recruit. The difference between a team like Bama and Oregon is that Bama is the best recruited team in the NCAA. Oregon conversely has recruiting averages on par with UT. That would make Oregon a mid-tier SEC team, assuming their new coach can get as much out of them as Kelly. Contrary to popular opinion, Oregon does not perform well against teams with similar or better talent. Truth be told, most of the NCAA doesn't (about 2/3 of the games can be predicted by simply looking at talent averages).
Mods. Give him his own thread for the Oregon game. I want to see his game day experience live. Good Luck!