President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

[rekinhavoc]

Airports are not required to use TSA. They can use private security with TSA oversight. And the private security firm must offer jobs to TSA personnel.

 

[ButchPlz]

Airports are not required to use TSA. They can use private security with TSA oversight. And the private security firm must offer jobs to TSA personnel.

Yes, "not required" to use TSA. I see.

 

[Ritzwatch]

No amendment is needed because the language in the 14th Amendment is clear. I mentioned this a while back, and my interpretation of the language was correct.

How are they not subject to the jurisdiction of the US? They aren’t diplomats.

Plenty of illegal immigrants are charged with crimes or subject to our laws every day - that is “subject to the jurisdiction.”

What am I missing?

 

[Go aeiou]

I've never heard a solid argument against it. You need an ID for just about every facet of public life, so who would getting a voter ID be so hard for.

What if already have a drivers license and a passport with your picture on it? DL also has your address.

 

[Vol423]

How are they not subject to the jurisdiction of the US? They aren’t diplomats.

Plenty of illegal immigrants are charged with crimes or subject to our laws every day - that is “subject to the jurisdiction.”

What am I missing?

No it is not. They are subject to the juridiction of whatever country the parents were citizens of before they illegally entered the US.

Here is a link to a video from Life, Liberty & Levin where he explains the meaning of that terminology in the 14th Amendment and the history behind it.

Mark Levin explains why there isn't constitutional basis for universal birthright citizenship | Fox News Video

Fox News host Mark Levin traces the history behind birthright citizenship on ‘Life, Liberty & Levin’ after President Donald Trump signed an executive order to ban the practice.

www.foxnews.com

 

[hog88]

You must have never experienced Amish work

Let me guess, you used to be Amish?

 

[BreatheUT]

View attachment 717224

The left won't go away with their vicious propaganda. They are like tribal gangs that realize everything they ever worked for is at stake. So they will not be deterred that their lack of integrity has been exposed and they've been made out as laughingstocks.

 

[swampfoxfan]

Let me guess, you used to be Amish?

Let me guess you have never been in Lawrence County, tn

 

[BreatheUT]

It took 100hrs…

Sometimes the difference in success and failure is a thin line, but the difference in competence and incompetence is miles wide.

The Biden Administration and the the left in general is an incompetent coalition that uses a graceful system to gain power through manipulation.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

It should never have been more than on oversight body to ensure that all the components are adhering to the standards of operation

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Massive cut in taxes.

Increase spending.

Increase inflation.



Time to buy more gold and silver.

You misspelled Bitcoin

 

[BeardedVol]

No it is not. They are subject to the juridiction of whatever country the parents were citizens of before they illegally entered the US.

Here is a link to a video from Life, Liberty & Levin where he explains the meaning of that terminology in the 14th Amendment and the history behind it.

Mark Levin explains why there isn't constitutional basis for universal birthright citizenship | Fox News Video

Fox News host Mark Levin traces the history behind birthright citizenship on ‘Life, Liberty & Levin’ after President Donald Trump signed an executive order to ban the practice.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Ritzwatch]

No it is not. They are subject to the juridiction of whatever country the parents were from before they illegally entered the US.

Here is a link to a video from Life, Liberty & Levin where he explains the meaning of that terminology in the 14th Amendment and the history behind it.

Mark Levin explains why there isn't constitutional basis for universal birthright citizenship | Fox News Video

Fox News host Mark Levin traces the history behind birthright citizenship on ‘Life, Liberty & Levin’ after President Donald Trump signed an executive order to ban the practice.

www.foxnews.com

I watched as much of that as I could; Levin’s style is just intolerable to me. I get tired of being yelled at.

I don’t find his argument persuasive. If the test was “allegiance”, that is the language that could have been used. They didn’t.

I just don’t see how our incarceration of illegal immigrants when they break the law, our demand that they obtain driver’s licenses to drive, our provision of social services to illegals, and the many other ways in which those here illegally must (rightfully) submit to laws and authority is anything other than clear and overwhelming evidence that illegal immigrants are subject to our jurisdiction.

I don’t even think it is a close call, but we will see how the courts handle this.

In any event, thanks for the reply and the link.

 

[NCFisher]

Remember the “black face of white supremacy”.
They are not very good at dealing with anyone who disagrees with the talking points.

People like this guy, as the LA Times dubbed him:



for running against The White Face of Black Pride, Gavin Newsom.

 

[volfanhill]

About 1,000 Tennesseans will lose thier jobs by March as 3 companies permanently shut down.
MAGA
I told you

Walk me through how 3 companies are shutting down permanently bc of a POTUS whose been in office less than a week?

 

[NCFisher]

"Everyday? Every single day? Every single solitary day, like 365 annually? For four years?"

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[NCFisher]

I watched as much of that as I could; Levin’s style is just intolerable to me. I get tired of being yelled at.

I don’t find his argument persuasive. If the test was “allegiance”, that is the language that could have been used. They didn’t.

I just don’t see how our incarceration of illegal immigrants when they break the law, our demand that they obtain driver’s licenses to drive, our provision of social services to illegals, and the many other ways in which those here illegally must (rightfully) submit to laws and authority is anything other than clear and overwhelming evidence that illegal immigrants are subject to our jurisdiction.

I don’t even think it is a close call, but we will see how the courts handle this.

In any event, thanks for the reply and the link.

Because everyone is subject to the laws of the country they're in, even if the citizens of another country. Which is how and why countries place importance on appealing diplomatically to protect their citizens abroad.

Words change in usage over time, and is why the intent in the age the constitution was inked must be determined.
Levin is fine man and great mind.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[rekinhavoc]

Yes, "not required" to use TSA. I see.

Is Tsa At All Airports? [Updated On 2025]

As of now, TSA PreCheck is available at more than 200 airports across the nation, with 85+ participating airlines. Eligible passengers can check to see which

travelpander.com

What Airport Does Not Use Tsa?​

San Francisco International Airport is one of a handful of airports in the United States that does not use the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) for its security screening. Instead, the airport employs private contractors to provide this service. There are a number of reasons why an airport might choose to do this, including the potential for increased efficiency and effectiveness.

The part in bold is my favorite.

 

[Vol423]

I watched as much of that as I could; Levin’s style is just intolerable to me. I get tired of being yelled at.

I don’t find his argument persuasive. If the test was “allegiance”, that is the language that could have been used. They didn’t.

I just don’t see how our incarceration of illegal immigrants when they break the law, our demand that they obtain driver’s licenses to drive, our provision of social services to illegals, and the many other ways in which those here illegally must (rightfully) submit to laws and authority is anything other than clear and overwhelming evidence that illegal immigrants are subject to our jurisdiction.

I don’t even think it is a close call, but we will see how the courts handle this.

In any event, thanks for the reply and the link.

You are correct that it isn't close. I think that in the Gettysburg Address, Lincoln should have simply said 87 years ago, but he didn't. He used language that was commonly understood at that time by everybody that heard it. In the same way, the language utilized in the 14th Amendment and the underlying contextual history of that law was commonly understood by everybody at the time that it was written. Liberals have since bastardized the original meaning of the 14th Amendment. They will usually completely leave out "...and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" when discussing it. Since they have controlled both the Supreme Court and the educational system for so long, they have indoctrinated generations of Americans to accept their skewed meaning of the 14th Amendment. Luckily, we now have a number of solid originalists on the Supreme Court. It will take time to work itself through the courts, but I fully expect this to be resolved in Trump's and the nation's favor.

 

[lawgator1]

View attachment 717459

Too bad numerous courts, including the Supreme Court, say that's incorrect. If the amendment is amended, so be it. You can make a case for that based on changes in the circumstances over 150 years.

But two things. First, don't pretend the language is other than it is. Second, understand that if you change the Fourteenth Amendment to reflect modern times, that means that others can be changed as well...

...for example the Second.

 

[VOLS INC.]

Look at her face. She looks visibly shaken as she hears this crazy idea that the American border to our south shouldn’t be open to anyone and everyone that wants to cross it.

 

[Vol423]

Is Tsa At All Airports? [Updated On 2025]

As of now, TSA PreCheck is available at more than 200 airports across the nation, with 85+ participating airlines. Eligible passengers can check to see which

travelpander.com

What Airport Does Not Use Tsa?​

San Francisco International Airport is one of a handful of airports in the United States that does not use the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) for its security screening. Instead, the airport employs private contractors to provide this service. There are a number of reasons why an airport might choose to do this, including the potential for increased efficiency and effectiveness.

The part in bold is my favorite.

What?!? The federal government is the very model of efficiency and effectiveness.

 

[Vol423]

Too bad numerous courts, including the Supreme Court, say that's incorrect. If the amendment is amended, so be it. You can make a case for that based on changes in the circumstances over 150 years.

But two things. First, don't pretend the language is other than it is. Second, understand that if you change the Fourteenth Amendment to reflect modern times, that means that others can be changed as well...

...for example the Second.

The Supreme Court and various lower court rulings also wrote into existence the Constitutional "right to abortion". The Supreme Court later ruled that was an erroneous Supreme Court decision. I am not arguing for a change to the 14th Amendment. I am arguing that the language used in the actual 14th Amendment (not the bastardized subsequent liberal legal spin on the 14th Amendment) was clear, and the Supreme Court will rule as such.

...and lawgator, you should watch the video that I linked above if you haven't already done so.