President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#12,876
#12,876
Orange_Crush said:
You seem to have a way of posting crazy, ignorant stuff, getting called out, and then creating alternate histories to try to escape the spotlight of epic failures.

When specifically asked to give different examples of the ceded powers you were mentioning, you tripled down on this specific thing. But then when you were in a corner, you invented completely different points that you *actually* meant.

Here's a refresher. Summary: "All I was doing was posting EXACTLY what he meant. Why didn't ya'll argue with him like this.?"









So, apparently you had all these points to make, but only wanted to make the point about endorsements, but endorsements were not pertinent to the conversation, so you couldn't name any examples because you were unaware of them.


That is some bear trap logic there.
Click to expand...
Man, I'm having some flashbacks.

You're strategy of being increasingly more stupid is fail safe.

You are so far off from reality on so many levels that it is simply overwhelming.
 
#12,883
#12,883
EasternVol said:
Yes, it's very common, happens all the time, but no examples come to mind. Excuse my scepticism.
Click to expand...
If you are sKeptical about downsizing ever happening with leadership changes then that your problem. It merely shows your disconnection from the subject at hand.

Here, it's common enough that they write articles about it.


It even has an example of two for you.

Just in case you won't take the time to click the link, here's one example:

Just last year, for example, after incoming HP CEO Enrique Lomas was named, the company announced it would cut between 7,000 and 9,000 employees over the next three years. Lomas characterized the move as HP “taking bold and decisive actions as we embark on our next chapter.”
Click to expand...

And from the same article, here's something pertinent to my comment about Federal job cuts:

Broader job cuts are more likely when the company is a mess​

When a company’s finances, culture, or both, are in bad shape, a new CEO will be charged with getting the company back on course. And often that can mean job cuts.

Consider Wells Fargo, which has been slammed with legal costs and dropping profits in the wake of its fake-accounts scandal.

Under former CEO Tim Sloan, the bank in 2018 announced up to 26,500 job cuts over three years.

When Sloan failed to turn things around sufficiently, the board hired Charlie Scharf to take over this past fall. Scharf has a reputation as a cost cutter and analysts expect him to reduce the bank’s elevated expenses, though it’s not clear yet how he will choose to do so.

But often when a new CEO comes in from the outside, employees can get some sense of that person’s approach by researching what they did at previous companies.

“Past behavior is usually a good indicator of future behavior,” said Stephen Miles, CEO of The Miles Group, an executive advisory firm.

When a company faces financial strain or needs to change strategy, new CEOs will want to buy themselves some breathing room. So they may be tempted to pull the biggest lever available to them, which is people costs, he added.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
#12,885
#12,885
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, EasternVol and Orange_Crush
#12,888
#12,888
Orange_Crush said:
If you are sKeptical about downsizing ever happening with leadership changes then that your problem. It merely shows your disconnection from the subject at hand.

Here, it's common enough that they write articles about it.


It even has an example of two for you.

Just in case you won't take the time to click the link, here's one example:



And from the same article, here's something pertinent to my comment about Federal job cuts:
Click to expand...
That's more relevant, thanks. Maybe some day I'll read about a major corporation that did a mass firing and rehiring exercise and how it worked for them.
 
#12,900
#12,900
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top