President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

Deep pocket Democrats fund violent protests towards anyone that disagrees with them.
Sounds like what the Joe Biden Crime Family would do when conservatives spoke in opposition to his god awful radical policies. Joe would direct his DOJ bulldog Garland (FBI) group to go after little old women at school board meetings. Calling them domestic terrorist and a threat to "his" power hunger run for dictatorship.


Is there actual evidence of Democrats funding protest?

I do remember mom donating peanut butter to participants in Dr. Kings March on Washington when marchers reached knoxville.
 

This guy thinks he is smart but he just doesn’t get it. I would encourage you to watch someone that doesn’t love to hear the sound of their own voice, someone that doesn’t repeat himself over and over, and finally someone that actually understands where this country was headed with the communist uniparty running everything.

He also looks like he would struggle changing his own oil or flat tire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buddy’s Bandit
This guy thinks he is smart but he just doesn’t get it. I would encourage you to watch someone that doesn’t love to hear the sound of their own voice, someone that doesn’t repeat himself over and over, and finally someone that actually understands where this country was headed with the communist uniparty running everything.

He also looks like he would struggle changing his own oil or flat tire.
where’s that video of the Canadian fearless leader crying like a child after talking to the big meany Trump.
Canada is soft
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buddy’s Bandit
Because there is of course zero hypocrisy in using a child cancer survivor as a prop in your political theater, while actively dismantling the research funding that contributed to saving that child's life.

I'm glad bringing in guests are now considered props. I'm surprised by the lack of depth in your posts. On the other hand, no I'm not.
 
There's that MAGA bigotry.
Your article fails to point out that in the U.S. population of 340 million, for example, a ratio of 1 in 80K - or about 4250 persons - have Swyers Syndrome. Of those, 15-20% exhibit presence of the SRY gene, or about 850 total persons. As correctly pointed out, these are biological chromosomal abnormalities. There are treatments to mitigate - to normalize - these biological deviancies to avoid infertility (a pretty necessary component of species propagation) and high-risk of osteoporosis.

In other words, these are maladies to be treated and researched to prevent. SA's attempt to harumph recognition of these chromosomal abnormalities as transphobia is simply advocacy agenda, not science. It is literally saying 'you don't understand sexual biology' when correctly asserting 339,995,750 of Americans are chromosomally normative. SA might as well say that acknowledging those with Symbrachydactyly (a congenital deformity or absence of fingers) present in 1 of 32K people, is as normal as those without the condition. That is, unless you're an activist scientist, you simply don't understand what normal fingers are.

You should read - or attempt to critically understand - your own links.
 
Last edited:

VN Store



Back
Top