President Joe Biden - Kamala Harris Administration

#18,776
#18,776
luthervol said:
And I'm smart enough to know that anyone who supported Trump is even dumber.
Click to expand...
iu
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, BreatheUT and luthervol
#18,783
#18,783
Who is really behind the attacks on Kamala Harris? Likely the Other Woman Who Would Be Queen

Imagine what it must have been like for Kamala Harris this past Sunday evening to be scrolling through the newsfeed on her smartphone only to come across what is typically a Democrat’s “reliable source” at CNN and finding the headline: Exasperation and dysfunction: Inside Kamala Harris’ frustrating start as vice president, on that team left rag’s landing page. The lengthy piece was very critical of her and her VP team’s role in the current Biden administration. She must have wondered what she had done to find herself suddenly under attack.

She would wonder because it would never occur to someone possessing her innate level of arrogance that anyone in her own party would attack her for anything. In Kamala Harris’ mind, she is the woman who would be queen, will be queen, come 2024 when feeble Joe Biden is unable to seek reelection and she will be the rightfully chosen heir to the throne.

The problem with that supposition, and this is strictly my own personal opinion and not shared with me by a secret White House source of the type that Human Event’s Jack Posobiec seems to have, is that it is precisely because of her desire to seek the throne that she is being thrown under the Brandon, sorry, Biden, bus. They are not going to let Kamala Harris hold the title of “first Black female President.” That honor is to be bestowed upon another very high-profile woman whose family name and political values are more in keeping with those of Joe Biden.

That woman is none other than Michelle Obama and I believe it is the Obama political machine, using Ron Klain as an anonymous director, who is behind the most recent attacks on our Vice President. Obama v. Harris; a female cage match for whom there is nobody to cheer.

Who is really behind the attacks on Kamala Harris? Likely the other woman who would be queen
 
#18,784
#18,784
C-south said:
Another number you just blow out of your ass.
Click to expand...
Here's a question you can avoid......
Among Biden voters, what % would list "he's not Trump" as one one of their top two reasons?

Just asking for your estimate. Don't be scared to estimate.
 
#18,785
#18,785
Using women as a chess piece in an "equality" row is ridiculous': Republicans criticize plan to enter women over 18 into the military draft in bill that could pass by next week

For the first time in the United States' 245-year history, American women could be required to sign up for the Selective Service with legislation expanding the draft expected to get the green light from Congress, a report out Wednesday stated.
A measure changing the requirements for the Selective Service from male-only to 'all Americans' could pass the Senate as early as this week, according to Axios.

The question of who should be compelled to serve has been debated in the US for years. Now it looks likely to pass with a bipartisan coalition of support, despite fury from some Republicans saying it is part of a row over political equality.

Congress on verge of including women in the military draft: GOP rips bid that could pass next week | Daily Mail Online
 
#18,786
#18,786
luthervol said:
Here's a question you can avoid......
Among Biden voters, what % would list "he's not Trump" as one one of their top two reasons?

Just asking for your estimate. Don't be scared to estimate.
Click to expand...

Based on dementia Joe’s attendance at rallies and pre-election events I would say he had no support and those that simply voted against Trump could be very high. I’ll add the mail in fiasco leaves even more to the imagination. I also think that based on our country’s current inept “leadership”, the economy, jobs, border mess, Covid, etc that most that voted for pedo-Joe are having buyers remorse and it shows in the polling numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#18,787
#18,787
luthervol said:
Here's a question you can avoid......
Among Biden voters, what % would list "he's not Trump" as one one of their top two reasons?

Just asking for your estimate. Don't be scared to estimate.
Click to expand...

Probably 10-15% I would guess but that doesn't excuse or eliminate them from blame in his unfitness for office. Replacing a clown with a shrunken head isn't an upgrade or a better solution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#18,789
#18,789
C-south said:
Based on dementia Joe’s attendance at rallies and pre-election events I would say he had no support and those that simply voted against Trump could be very high. I’ll add the mail in fiasco leaves even more to the imagination. I also think that based on our country’s current inept “leadership”, the economy, jobs, border mess, Covid, etc that most that voted for pedo-Joe are having buyers remorse and it shows in the polling numbers.
Click to expand...
Thanks for answering.
You are correct. There was never any love for Biden. There is still no love for Biden.
There was always great hatred of Trump. There is still great hatred of Trump.
I did not support Hillary in the 2016 primaries precisely because I knew how much she was hated (justified or not) by millions on the right. I knew that should she win, the right would stop at nothing to destroy her and that it would just further divide the country. My question was always why more on the right didn't realize the same about Trump. I reluctantly realized that most did realize it and that it was actually a big reason for their support. That's what I have always found so pathetic.
 
#18,790
#18,790
landscapingvol said:
Probably 10-15% I would guess but that doesn't excuse or eliminate them from blame in his unfitness for office. Replacing a clown with a shrunken head isn't an upgrade or a better solution.
Click to expand...
My estimate is much higher. 10 - 15% would be true for any candidate.
My position is that nominating a candidate that you know is justifiably despised by a larger than average portion on the other side is a poor strategy. And damaging to the country.
 
#18,792
#18,792
Franklin Pierce said:
Using women as a chess piece in an "equality" row is ridiculous': Republicans criticize plan to enter women over 18 into the military draft in bill that could pass by next week

For the first time in the United States' 245-year history, American women could be required to sign up for the Selective Service with legislation expanding the draft expected to get the green light from Congress, a report out Wednesday stated.
A measure changing the requirements for the Selective Service from male-only to 'all Americans' could pass the Senate as early as this week, according to Axios.

The question of who should be compelled to serve has been debated in the US for years. Now it looks likely to pass with a bipartisan coalition of support, despite fury from some Republicans saying it is part of a row over political equality.

Congress on verge of including women in the military draft: GOP rips bid that could pass next week | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...
Females should have register. Better yet do away with selective service altogether.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and LouderVol
#18,793
#18,793
landscapingvol said:
Probably 10-15% I would guess but that doesn't excuse or eliminate them from blame in his unfitness for office. Replacing a clown with a shrunken head isn't an upgrade or a better solution.
Click to expand...
Higher than that, I expect. Trump was the most polarizing president in modern history.

Roughly a third of all voters (130M historical voters) are going to vote for the party candidate.
A third swing between the major parties.
Then we have the Increase in votes over the 2016 election, about 30M.

I think it is reasonable to attribute some votes against trump in the swing vote and new vote categories. If it was everyone in those categories, the total would be around 69M votes against Trump. Unlikely. I think it is more accurate to say a smaller percentage of swing votes ( a minority of the total) was against trump and a larger percentage (majority of the total) of new votes were against trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#18,795
#18,795
luthervol said:
My estimate is much higher. 10 - 15% would be true for any candidate.
My position is that nominating a candidate that you know is justifiably despised by a larger than average portion on the other side is a poor strategy. And damaging to the country.
Click to expand...

What about intentionally nominating a candidate who is physically, mentally, and cognitively unfit for office? What kind of damage does that do to the country?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, UT_Dutchman, BreatheUT and 1 other person
#18,796
#18,796
luthervol said:
Thanks for answering.
You are correct. There was never any love for Biden. There is still no love for Biden.
There was always great hatred of Trump. There is still great hatred of Trump.
I did not support Hillary in the 2016 primaries precisely because I knew how much she was hated (justified or not) by millions on the right. I knew that should she win, the right would stop at nothing to destroy her and that it would just further divide the country. My question was always why more on the right didn't realize the same about Trump. I reluctantly realized that most did realize it and that it was actually a big reason for their support. That's what I have always found so pathetic.
Click to expand...
Trump was a good president. Could have been much much better if he had any support at all. But you hate this country, so I understand your perspective.

Have you determined one great thing your boy is doing for the country?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, UT_Dutchman, BreatheUT and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top