President Joe Biden - Kamala Harris Administration

#19,276
#19,276
luthervol said:
lol........
  1. Nice: This word used to mean “silly, foolish, simple.” Far from the compliment it is today!
  2. Silly: Meanwhile, silly went in the opposite direction: in its earliest uses, it referred to things worthy or blessed; from there it came to refer to the weak and vulnerable, and more recently to those who are foolish.
  3. Awful: Awful things used to be “worthy of awe” for a variety of reasons, which is how we get expressions like “the awful majesty of God.”
The last to use an antiquated definition while rejecting the currently accepted one is silly.
And almost always an old conservative, dadgumit.
Click to expand...

Like trying to change the literal definition of what a mural is ? I guess progressives think if you say something enough times it will magically make it so .
“Oh look another beautiful BLM MURAL painted on the street outside the White House” . Sometime people are just ignorant .
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#19,277
#19,277
0nelilreb said:
Like trying to change the literal definition of what a mural is ? I guess progressives think if you say something enough times it will magically make it so .
“Oh look another beautiful BLM MURAL painted on the street outside the White House” . Sometime people are just ignorant .
Click to expand...
Nice post. (You get to decide which definition)
 
#19,280
#19,280
luthervol said:
lol........
  1. Nice: This word used to mean “silly, foolish, simple.” Far from the compliment it is today!
  2. Silly: Meanwhile, silly went in the opposite direction: in its earliest uses, it referred to things worthy or blessed; from there it came to refer to the weak and vulnerable, and more recently to those who are foolish.
  3. Awful: Awful things used to be “worthy of awe” for a variety of reasons, which is how we get expressions like “the awful majesty of God.”
The last to use an antiquated definition while rejecting the currently accepted one is silly.
And almost always an old conservative, dadgumit.
Click to expand...

I get your point. Are there examples of how a definition change alters the way a society functions? These changes are ones that only affect the way we speak. I can’t think of any others that are used to change how society functions. Maybe “infrastructure” 😬😬
 
#19,290
#19,290
'Don't forget the candidate for the U.S. president himself last year prior to the election called Kyle Rittenhouse a white supremacist,' said David Hancock, a spokesman for Rittenhouse, on November 9 on Fox News.

'Joe Biden called him a white supremacist; that is appalling. I can't even gauge how wrong that is,' he said in reference to a 2020 Biden-Harris campaign video tweeted by the then-nominee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123
#19,292
#19,292
Our 1st woman of color VP Giggle Box with NO CLUE was for 85 minutes today the POTUS.
Hoorah. It's a first ever y'all. OK ..... now back to our normal programming.
 
Last edited:
#19,293
#19,293
ButchPlz said:
Anti-science bigotry on full display.

I still don't understand how the party of science and love feels good about encouraging (especially) young people down a path of mental disorder, anxiety, and an extremely high rate of suicide.
Click to expand...

Have you ever noticed that the left are what they claim they aren't (anti science, for example), and aren't at all what they claim to be (tolerant, respectful, educated vs indoctrinated, etc).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol423 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#19,294
#19,294
AM64 said:
Have you ever noticed that the left are what they claim they aren't (anti science, for example), and aren't at all what they claim to be (tolerant, respectful, educated vs indoctrinated, etc).
Click to expand...
Of course- hold the other to an impossible standard and blast them for it, while simultaneously not allowing yourself to be held to standards at all because you're always on the attack. That's literally right out of their playbook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#19,295
#19,295
luthervol said:
The economy would have done the same had Trump won.
Probably worse because COVID would have been more of an ongoing issue.
Click to expand...

There likely would have been an inflationary bump post covid hysteria under any administration; however, your fools changed it to a roaring fire and are continuing to feed it gas.

I've been noticing lately the press aren't raving about covid perhaps to boost the biden foolishness. It's still the same disease, and a lot of us were inoculated with a vaccine developed under Trump policies. Your side has little to brag about as far as accomplishments. Trump like any sitting president took the hit for something he didn't originate and couldn't control - but did manage to some extent (remember his shutting off air travel and being demonized by the other side?). Biden is "basking" in the recovery - some credit to Trump policy, much credit to the medical community, and some credit to nature. My view is different from many I normally agree with here in that I do believe limitations in activity were necessary to limit overwhelming medical facilities - although on second thought that would have been more probable in dem infested cities (critical mass for transmission) - becoming to some extent a self correcting error.
 
#19,298
#19,298
luthervol said:
About what I expected.
Then by that simplistic and antiquated definition, 99.98% of people belong to one of two genders.
But that is not the definition used by the more enlightened.
Click to expand...

Your numbers are probably exaggerated; but even if you accept them, then you are saying that 99.98% of the population need to change all that they believe in a matter to accommodate .02% ? How does this logic fit with democratic beliefs - where it's more the majority that rule? Who exactly made the decision that the .02% were no longer mentally ill and needed to be viewed instead as role models. The "party of science"?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top