Qanon -The Storm

[GoVolsDR]

LOL. Gotta have some Caveman. :loco:

These are bits that he literally stole from Bill Hicks, LMAO

 

[BigOrangeD]

QPost 1617

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 3831d8 No.1940496 📁
Jun 28 2018 11:10:15 (EST)
Only the beginning.
Power to the people.
25 Most Influential People on the Internet in 2018 | Time
Q

QPost 1618

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 3831d8 No.1940595 📁
Jun 28 2018 11:17:39 (EST)

Anonymous ID: e466e6 No.1940568 📁
Jun 28 2018 11:15:28 (EST)
>>1940496
THis hearing is incredibly painful to sit thru and extremely frustrating. Nothing about this hearing will change the minds of those still asleep. When will something be revealed to wake up more sleepers?

>>1940568
Focus on House floor vote (now).
Q

QPost 1619

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 3831d8 No.1940684 📁
Jun 28 2018 11:22:02 (EST)
Why are they trying to ‘normalize’ this?
Facebook survey asks users if they condone pedophilia
What is coming?
Do they really believe this will EVER be swallowed?
Will the progressive LEFT defend and support these actions once those guilty are brought to LIGHT?
These people are SICK!
They do NOT love this country.
Q

QPost 1620

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 3831d8 No.1940746 📁
Jun 28 2018 11:24:37 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 1aeb38 No.1940664 📁
Jun 28 2018 11:20:57 (EST)
>>1940595
>Focus on House floor vote (now).

ALREADY IN NOTABLES, Q!
House passes measure demanding DOJ documents
In a 226-183 vote, lawmakers approved the messaging measure, which calls on the DOJ to turn over all of the documents House Republicans have requested related to the FBI's handling of investigations during the 2016 presidential election.

The party-line vote, with one Republican voting present, puts the entire conference on the record in the escalating feud between the DOJ and House Republicans, who have been fighting for months for access to a trove of highly-sensitive documents.
thehill.com/homenews/house/394604-house-passes-measure-demanding-doj-documents

>>1940664
Who brought the bill to the floor?
Read between the lines.
Q

QPost 1621

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 3831d8 No.1940910 📁
Jun 28 2018 11:33:42 (EST)
We remember you, Mr. VIP!
Twitter
WWG1WGA!
Where did the Storm derive from?
Some things leave lasting impressions.
Listen carefully.
White Squall 1996 Movie Trailer (Jeff Bridges, Scott Wolf) - YouTube
When did POTUS make the statement?
When did we arrive to start the awakening?
You have more than you know.
Fireworks.
Q

 

[ajvol01]

[twitter]1012171143661473794[/twitter]

 

[BigOrangeD]

QPost 1622

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 3831d8 No.1941208 📁
Jun 28 2018 11:52:13 (EST)
31F3583D-EBFA-4583-B090-E328C4A0F9B3.jpeg

Are you ready?
Q

QPost 1623

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: aaf6b0 No.1942596 📁
Jun 28 2018 13:25:13 (EST)
Trying to ‘normalize’.
Netflix under fire for film critics say contains child pornography | Fox News
Who just joined the Board of Netflix?
Who pushed?
What is coming?
Q

QPost 1624

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: aaf6b0 No.1942657 📁
Jun 28 2018 13:28:04 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 7f61a8 No.1942629 📁
Jun 28 2018 13:26:44 (EST)
>>1942596
Sick people Q I wish I could get these bastards with you. Go get em!

>>1942629
We are!
PAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Q

 

[ajvol01]

Netflix under fire for film critics say contains child pornography | Fox News

Netflix under fire for film critics say contains child pornography
Sasha Savitsky3 hours ago
desire film poster
Netflix has come under fire for a movie streaming on their site that some viewers say contains a scene that is child pornography.

The opening scene of the Argentinian film "Desire" depicts two young girls under the age of 10 playing around with pillows. The scene takes a sexual turn involving one of the girls.

The news site PJ Media said it reported the film to the FBI and Department of Justice for child pornography. The FBI told Fox News, "Per DOJ policy, the FBI neither confirms nor denies the existence of an investigation."

The film remains on Netflix's site and a rep for the streaming service did not return Fox News' request for comment. It was not immediately clear what Netflix's vetting policy is for films.

Angry viewers took to Twitter to share their disgust and are calling on Netflix to remove the film and start an investigation.

"@Netflix WHY ARE YOU OFFERING KIDDIE PORN??? #Desire @FBI @TheJusticeDept PLEASE investigate," one user tweeted.

@netflix @FBI @TheJusticeDept Netflix WHY ARE YOU OFFERING KIDDIE PORN??? #Desire @FBI @TheJusticeDept PLEASE investigate

— Vicious St. Bernard (@chrisbo62) June 28, 2018
Another wrote, "Watch the first few minutes of the movie Desire from Netflix promotion of pedophilia absolutely disgusting!! Parents should be arrested for this scene alone!!"

Watch the first few minutes of the movie Desire from Netflix
promotion of pedophilia absolutely disgusting!! Parents should be arrested for this scene alone!!

— TamiAnn (@TamiAnn02) June 27, 2018
"@netflix You need to remove the film Desire from your service IMMEDIATELY. You are MAKING AVAILABLE CHILD PORN by leaving this film up. I am DISGUSTED and will be canceling my service if this is not fixed ASAP. What is wrong with you?!"

@netflix You need to remove the film Desire from your service IMMEDIATELY. You are MAKING AVAILABLE CHILD PORN by leaving this film up. I am DISGUSTED and will be canceling my service if this is not fixed ASAP. What is wrong with you?!

— Nicole (@NMChampagne) June 27, 2018
It's illegal to stream child porn. @Netflix is under investigation for doing so. So glad I cancelled my subscription 2 months ago.

— Lex_511 (@Lex_491) June 28, 2018
Yeah Netflix isn't worth the money when they put up borderline child porn

— XD (@TannerTomey) June 28, 2018
@netflix Care to comment on the allegations of streaming perceived child porn?

— Recreational Nuke (@2A_gibs_nukes) June 28, 2018
According to Section 2256 of Title 18 of the United States Code, child pornography is "any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age)."

You can find Sasha Savitsky on Twitter @SashaFB.

 

[ajvol01]

1625
28-Jun-2018 17:29:20 EDT
Q !CbboFOtcZs
8ch/qresearch: 1945344
Copy link to post
Report: Facebook Investors Consider Coup of CEO Mark Zuckerberg | Breitbart
Q

Q [1625]

 

[ajvol01]

1626
28-Jun-2018 17:42:44 EDT
Q !CbboFOtcZs
8ch/qresearch: 1945571

>>1945408
Server or JA = truth exposed (SR).
D’s are in crisis mode.
AWAN is bigger than you can imagine.
Putin / U1 will come out post summit (they will try to apply artificial MSM heat to cancel).
These people are corrupt beyond belief.
America for sale.
Sold out.
Q


Q [1626]

 

[ajvol01]

1627
28-Jun-2018 17:51:18 EDT
Q !CbboFOtcZs
8ch/qresearch: 1945747

>>1945594

Low IQ Maxine should be blamed!
They know exactly what they are doing.
Q

Q [1627]

 

[ajvol01]

1628
28-Jun-2018 17:57:51 EDT
Q !CbboFOtcZs
8ch/qresearch: 1945864

>>1945685

Coincidence?
JA in the news a lot lately (out of nowhere).
Crisis mode.
Q

Q [1628]

 

[ajvol01]

1629
28-Jun-2018 18:19:24 EDT
Q !CbboFOtcZs
8ch/qresearch: 1946203

Law enforcement should interview the therapists.
Each shooter has one coincidentally.
Targets?
Relocation within 30 days of each shooting?
New name?
FBI doesn’t know this?
Spooks are hard to find?
Dream to reality.
Q

Q [1629]

 

[ajvol01]

Q [1630]

1630
28-Jun-2018 18:23:24 EDT
Q !CbboFOtcZs
8ch/qresearch: 1946309
Copy link to post

>>1946203

Why are Freemasons on the scene of most shooting locations?
Openly giving interviews or in background shots?
Symbolism will be their downfall.
Q

 

[PKT_VOL]

Always a possibility. That's why I stay cautiously optimistic. About the only thing I know for sure when it comes to Q are the Proofs and that Q has connected a lot of dots that hardly anyone else has been able to do.

Historicism is a faulty method which produces worthless results (Popper).

It is a folly for one to retroactively seek to connect the dots of vague past predictions in order to prove the authenticity of a person claiming special knowledge. That allows the charlatans to feast. Those who are not charlatans can provide falsifiability (also Popper).

 

[RavinDave]

You forgot Temple of the Dog.

One of the best collaborations of eventual mega-superstars, Soundgarden and what would become Pearl Jam. Many regard Vedder to be the last living vocal icon of the Seattle-based “grunge” movement, even though he and Cornell hated the title (they played “rock-n-roll,” in his words, and I’d have to agree... grunge was/is a “marketing” meme).

Wood, Staley, Cobain, Cornell, all befallen to the life of being a “rocker.”

You left out Jim Morrison, Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin. Hazy memories from my youth...

 

[ajvol01]

You left out Jim Morrison, Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin. Hazy memories from my youth...

John Bonham also

 

[BigOrangeD]

QPost 1631

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: c545bc No.1946524 📁
Jun 28 2018 17:32:20 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 0491f6 No.1946381 📁
Jun 28 2018 17:25:27 (EST)
necklace.jpg

>>1946309
Yup.

 

[BigOrangeD]

More decodes from Paying Medic

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lepX52Ee7bA[/youtube]

 

[PKT_VOL]

Does it really matter?

If what has been suggested by Q is revealed to be true the end justifies the means.

All veterans and service members took this oath - if the allegations are true this is a silent war against many domestic enemies.

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

In one scenario, you have an intelligence officer(s) with access to highly classified, top secret information of treason committed by the former administration while in the second scenario you have a political operative that is intentionally feeding the political base disinformation/propaganda in order to increase voter enthusiasm for mid-term elections.

Of course it would matter. How could it not?

Only the former would invoke your oath. The latter is just political fodder.

 

[NorthDallas40]

So what is the deal with the Free Masons?!

 

[BigOrangeD]

Speaking Quite Frankly About Q Anon (June 28)

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SZCIuJCWQM[/youtube]

 

[ajvol01]

QPost 1631

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: c545bc No.1946524 📁
Jun 28 2018 17:32:20 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 0491f6 No.1946381 📁
Jun 28 2018 17:25:27 (EST)
necklace.jpg

>>1946309
Yup.

1631
28-Jun-2018 18:32:20 EDT
Q !CbboFOtcZs
8ch/qresearch: 1946524

>>1946381
Everywhere!
Q

 

[ajvol01]

In one scenario, you have an intelligence officer(s) with access to highly classified, top secret information of treason committed by the former administration while in the second scenario you have a political operative that is intentionally feeding the political base disinformation/propaganda in order to increase voter enthusiasm for mid-term elections.

Of course it would matter. How could it not?

Only the former would invoke your oath. The latter is just political fodder.

You must've missed this part

If what has been suggested by Q is revealed to be true the end justifies the means.

 

[BigOrangeD]

1631
28-Jun-2018 18:32:20 EDT
Q !CbboFOtcZs
8ch/qresearch: 1946524

>>1946381
Everywhere!
Q

Thanks for getting that. I totally missed that part. Makes more sense now.

 

[RavinDave]

John Bonham also

Joplin's and Bonham's were ruled accidental. But Bonham croaked in his sleep (choked on his own vomit) after 40 shots of vodka, while Janis OD'ed on heroin. Tantamount to suicide in both cases IMO.

 

[PKT_VOL]

You must've missed this part

Only one scenario has his (specific) information as true.

 

[ajvol01]

Only one scenario has his (specific) information as true.

I don't have a problem with skepticism, but I don't see the value in debating whether or not other people should follow Q or not based on something we won't know until many months or possibly years in the future.