Coming full circle after a few comments; my thought process was multi-layered, each year our first major commit has come from the QB, I have to assume for multiple reasons (we heavily invest dollars there, historically great players want to play for a great QB, etc), but we’d be naive to think with the current NIL landscape, these 18 year old high profile athletes are going to go where the money is most offered (for the most part). For UT specifically, the great players haven’t followed Nico or G-Mac in throves. I have to believe we verbally commit such a strong financial package to the QB’s that we do come up short on the other positional players despite we constantly hearing that we made a competitive offer. So while we can’t boost recency in a championship pedigree like Bama, UGA, etc, how do we get over that next hump? Go to Dolly and ask for a line of credit, it seems the only thing being thrown around is raise more money. Having worked in the AD at UT for 5 years in the mid to late 2000’s, it’s never been an issue of investment (see facilities, sponsorships, etc). In my opinion, I think it’s an error in our recruiting strategy, and while I say that, I want to acknowledge I’m in full appreciation of what Coach Heupel has done and is doing, but there is a major difference in top 12-15, and really competing in that Top 5 sector. I understand landing “premier” talent does not always correlate to that player producing. I’ll hang up and listen