Did you previously state that you were military intelligence?
Maybe some of the USAF posters can clear this up; however, I have never heard any Air Force analysts, ISR guys, or operational intel guys ever refer to themselves or their compatriots as MI.
Again, I was not in the AF; I was Army. That said, I have spent time in quite a few Joint BAEs.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I don't know this for a fact, but I assume GS has been retired for a good spell.
Happens after the LSD experiments?
Latrine engineering spec ops
He's seen... things. Things he doesn't want to talk about.
Even if he did work in the intel community in the AF during Vietnam, it would be hard to imagine he saw any combat in such a role, much less more combat than any combat arms Soldier in OIF or OEF.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
It's pathetic that just because you disagree with a guys views you have to try and discredit him and even question his sanity but as ususal list ZERO facts to prove your points. Instead it just shows childish disdain and frankly a weak mind.
It's pathetic that just because you disagree with a guys views you have to try and discredit him and even question his sanity but as ususal list ZERO facts to prove your points. Instead it just shows childish disdain and frankly a weak mind.
I didn't use the term 'MI', you did, I was just trying to give you an honest answer.
I'm not familiar with the term BAE.
The only time I was with a joint force was when we had a very small Naval detachment on base that used our facilities.
So what did you do while serving and for how long?
It's pathetic that just because you disagree with a guys views you have to try and discredit him and even question his sanity but as ususal list ZERO facts to prove your points. Instead it just shows childish disdain and frankly a weak mind.
I will absolutely discredit him. His statements are inconsistent, violent, radical, and he defends them with more than a handful of personal anecdotes, thus bringing his credibility into the discussion.
The logic courses at both Cambridge and Oxford would disagree with your position that ad hominem attacks and questions of credibility show weak mindedness. Thanks for the pointers, though.
Once again not one credible shred of evidence, your welcome by the way. btw thanks for being the voice of the "logic courses" of those fine universities..lol