Question on QB

#26
#26
Originally posted by Jmxvol@Nov 5, 2005 8:17 PM
Ainge had a pretty good game. We moved the ball most of the day fairly consistantly. Why in the world would Clausen even play the rest of the year? He's gona be gone anyway.
[snapback]183777[/snapback]​

13 of 37 for 187 yards with TWO interceptions and one td. These stats SUCK and so does Ainge. Funny how our perception of what a good game is around here. :mf_surrender:
 
#27
#27
Originally posted by donsargegolf@Nov 6, 2005 4:27 PM
13 of 37 for 187 yards with TWO interceptions and one td. These stats SUCK and so does Ainge. Funny how our perception of what a good game is around here.  :mf_surrender:
[snapback]184515[/snapback]​

So this is who you are constantly going to bash now since Sanders is out of the picture? :disappointed:
 
#28
#28
Originally posted by donsargegolf@Nov 6, 2005 4:27 PM
13 of 37 for 187 yards with TWO interceptions and one td. These stats SUCK and so does Ainge. Funny how our perception of what a good game is around here.  :mf_surrender:
[snapback]184515[/snapback]​


I understand your frustration, and I think good in this case is a relative term. Good means ok in comparison to previous offensive performances this year.

You have to admit the Vols found rhythm yesterday until the fourth quarter. They looked as good in the third quarter as they have all year. Granted, that is not saying much.
 
#29
#29
I'm a huge supporter of no personal attacks on this board, attack the opinion. But one day Sarge is gonna post something positive and I'm gonna be glad I have Aflac :drive2:
 
#32
#32
Originally posted by USAF_Vol@Nov 5, 2005 8:37 PM
Once again, I say, I wish we had Brent.
[snapback]183793[/snapback]​

I agree with that statement, my good friend.
 
#33
#33
MOBILE QB's

When did this become so important? Sure it's nice if they are mobile. But if that was the IDEAL thing to have, the NFL would be doing it. You can have Vince Young and Marcus Vick (although they are good). I'll take Matt Leinart and Jay Cutler (did I just say I'd take a Vandy QB over a Heisman hopeful?).
 
#34
#34
Originally posted by Orangewhiteblood@Nov 6, 2005 5:29 PM
So this is who you are constantly going to bash now since Sanders is out of the picture?  :disappointed:
[snapback]184517[/snapback]​


CPF, of course! After all, he's a big target. Err, I mean, he's big enough to take the heat, naw, that is, ah, heck. He's fatter than me, and that's saying a lot!
 
#35
#35
Originally posted by donsargegolf@Nov 6, 2005 4:27 PM
13 of 37 for 187 yards with TWO interceptions and one td. These stats SUCK and so does Ainge. Funny how our perception of what a good game is around here.  :mf_surrender:
[snapback]184515[/snapback]​



thank you somebody that has some sense!!!!
 
#36
#36
Originally posted by thebiglowboski@Nov 6, 2005 10:58 PM
thank you  somebody that has some sense!!!!
[snapback]184821[/snapback]​

:haha_oh:
 
#37
#37
Originally posted by Orangewhiteblood@Nov 5, 2005 8:19 PM
Personally, I think it's time that Tennessee starts looking for some mobile QB's.  We need one that is a good passer, good runner and goes to class and meetings.
[snapback]183837[/snapback]​

Arkansas, Miss State and Ole Miss have "mobile" ex starting QB's that I'm sure would give us. I like a QB that can run if necessary but is generally a pocket guy i.e. a Tee Martin or Heath Schuler.
 
#38
#38
Originally posted by rockydoc@Nov 6, 2005 11:45 PM
Arkansas, Miss State and Ole Miss have "mobile" ex starting QB's that I'm sure would give us.
[snapback]184864[/snapback]​

No thanks. I said one that is a good passer AND a good runner. I don't want one or the other.
 
#40
#40
Originally posted by Orangewhiteblood@Nov 6, 2005 11:47 PM
No thanks.  I said one that is a good passer AND a good runner.  I don't want one or the other.
[snapback]184865[/snapback]​


OK, who might that be? I haven't seen this person.

I'll let my TB run and my QB run the show.
 

VN Store



Back
Top